← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 518698960

14 posts 6 images 8 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: aCd0Uh6G) United States No.518698960 >>518699070 >>518699234 >>518699922 >>518700641
> From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
-Marx

Isn’t this PEAK human exploitation?
>people are producing at maximum capacity
>people are consuming at base necessity
This seems to be a recipe for extraction the theoretical maximum surplus value of another persons labor.
>if they don’t produce to their ability, they are underutilized
>if they take more than they need they are overconsuming

Seriously, someone fucking explain how it is even THEORETICALLY possible to exploit someone to a greater degree than
> From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
It’s literally fucking impossible.
Anonymous (ID: HG/Jhbkf) Sweden No.518699070 >>518699275 >>518699368 >>518699864 >>518699875
>>518698960 (OP)
> From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
This is the type of principle that sounds good on a surface level (if you are dumb), but when taken to its logical conclusion results in a complete collapse of incentive structure, and the most capable people in society will just be slaves working towards someone else's cause, plagued by mediocrity and unfulfilment.
Anonymous (ID: EzF38pND) United States No.518699077 >>518699875
It depends on where that surplus value is going. If it's getting efficiently redistributed back to the welfare of the population and not siphoned off by a parasitic elite then that is theoretically how one would maximize the general welfare
Anonymous (ID: K0uGfW33) Germany No.518699234
>>518698960 (OP)
Lmao this nigger is still trying to argue with FACTS and LOGIC.
Nigger dont you understand REAL communism is when GOOOD STUFFFF!!!

Finally understand that communism and communism are two sides of the same jewish coin.
A means to an end in which the jews own everything and you are nothing more than their slave.
Anonymous (ID: K0uGfW33) Germany No.518699275
>>518699070
>the most capable
No, the most exploitable.
Anonymous (ID: EzF38pND) United States No.518699368 >>518699541
>>518699070
Capitalist societies are also plagued by mediocrity and unfulfillment because pure selfish materialism is as much of an autistic oversimplification of human motivation as the idea that we should all participate in a eusocial bug hive hugbox
Anonymous (ID: K0uGfW33) Germany No.518699541
>>518699368
Kinda this, jews have no soul, jews own our countries and influence our culture, so our culture becomes exactly that
Anonymous (ID: 142kfKgB) No.518699864
>>518699070
Soviet comedy clip on soviet work ethics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYBwY6zKSNk
Anonymous (ID: aCd0Uh6G) United States No.518699875 >>518700588
>>518699070
No you don’t understand.
You only get your needs taken care of if you give to your ability. Consider slavery. People are well capable of working 15+ hour days. People are able to be experimented on. Women are able to produce more glorious communists.
>whether they like it or not
A humans needs are rather meager as well, when you get right down to it.

>>518699077
>peak human exploitation is a good thing if we help the ones we are exploiting.
You people are wild.
Anonymous (ID: EgHCb6kJ) Finland No.518699922
>>518698960 (OP)
Communism sucks because it doesn't extract nearly enough to sustain itself. Now to each according to what they minimally accept and you are talking.
Anonymous (ID: EzF38pND) United States No.518700588 >>518701969
>>518699875
>peak human exploitation is a good thing if we help the ones we are exploiting.
I'm not even making an ideological statement brainlet. If you had everyone produce as much as they were able to while consuming as little as they needed to then that would produce the theoretical maximum amount of surplus, which if it were then perfectly redistributed to improving the quality of everyone's lives would be how you would maximize the general welfare
Anonymous (ID: BbrgIDZ3) Italy No.518700641
>>518698960 (OP)
>Isn’t this PEAK human exploitation?
No, Ameripoor. This is:

«A 2023 survey conducted by Payroll.org highlighted that 78% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, a 6% increase from the previous year. In other words, more than three-quarters of Americans struggle to save or invest after paying for their monthly expenses.

Similarly, a 2023 Forbes Advisor survey revealed that nearly 70% of respondents either identified as living paycheck to paycheck (40%) or—even more concerning—reported that their income doesn’t even cover their standard expenses (29%).» - https://www.forbes.com/advisor/banking/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-statistics-2024/
Anonymous (ID: aCd0Uh6G) United States No.518701969
>>518700588
Maybe not being perpetual slaves would maximize welfare more efficiently?
Possibly even to a greater degree?
Anonymous (ID: W2czVZEn) Australia No.518702139
Yeah, it's retarded