>>518808126
>You see this? This is called unhinged moral outrage.
No, again, that's you projecting. That is called reasonable concern.
You are trying to exaggerate concerns expressed into moral outrage to use that to imply an emotional or morally-oriented, and thus fraught, source of concern.
But that's not the case.
The concern is grounded in reason, as this state of affairs is decreasing the functional state of our society, bereft of any moral judgements thereabout, and you, specifically, are trying to cloud this paradigm as much as possible, by all appearances, for example projecting moral labeling, and implying equivalence in actions across regimes which simply is not accurate.
You are wasting your time telling us how you're not wasting your time?
The only side you have to pick is anti-Jewish/anti-Zionist, and if you won't pick that side, YOU ARE PICKING A SIDE. That's the point, which you are trying to shield or else are blind to.
In that paradigm, one side IS better than the other.
And while you might profess to espouse such, what that translates into is a preoccupation with elements of the faux-dichotomy, despite denying that as your position, which forces you into a stance which benefits one side versus the other, which you must be well aware of.
>At a certain point, all of the robust support that both Biden and Trump have had for Israel over the years kind of speaks for itself.
It does, esp taking the whole picture into account - it paints that it is not liberals or institutions we must be concerned with presently, but Jews, Zionist Jews especially.
Yet, you imply otherwise, consistently.
You imply 'American hegemony' exists, but America is nothing but a puppet on the hand of Israel at this point, both sides of our political paradigm controlled by foreign interests, via means both financial and more (vice especially).
Jewish hegemony is what exists, and what those in true power seek to perpetuate.