Thread 518813620

Holy based

Nick Fuentes is a zionist.

>>518813620 (OP)
OH HE POSTED HARD WERE WINNING THE POSTING WARS

>>518813620 (OP)
>nu-zionist attacking oldfag-zionist
Mutts politics rn

WE WON THE CLICKING MESSAGES WAR

"Israel is our greatest ally in the middle east, I will kill and die for Israel" - Nick Fuentes quote

>>518813620 (OP)
>Not wearing your official Jew beanie to see the President.

Most disrespectful.

>>518813888
>>518814075
>>518814106
>>518814183
>>518814197

Kys faggot shills, you'll all be in ovens soon enough

>>518814439
POST HARDER FAGGOT 2 MORE POSTS 2 MORE TWITTER LIKES 2 MORE (You)s

POST FUCKING HARDER THE JEWS HATE IT WHEN WE SIT ON OUR ASSES LOOKING AT COMPUTER SCREENS LIKE SLEEPING COWS

>>518814075
>>518814623
lmao you are so butthurt
people in the white house already admitted to being afraid to speak out against him and the groypers because they know what happens next

>>518814829
KEEP POSTING ON JEWISH WEBSITES

ITS
HOW
WE
WIN

balfour lease expired

>>518813620 (OP)
The fuck is a knesset?

>>518813620 (OP)
Based

>>518814977
>keeping establishment hacks from winning elections
>merely posting on websites
i forgot for a moment i was speaking to someone with double digit iq lol

>>518815193
the parliament of the wakanda of pedophiles, aka israel

>>518815321
>keeping establishment hacks from winning elections
When the fuck did that happen? You people are retarded.

>>518815543
>what is the biggest reason tucker came out and called him a fed and democrat plant
no spoonfeeding, bitch.

This thread didnt go so well for namefaggots.

>>518813620 (OP)
stay there jewy ben

>>518815684
So you acknowledge that kent was a good guy and nick attacked him because nicks a fed? Because thats what tucker was saying.

>>518813620 (OP)
Nick is a closeted flip flopping sycophant.

>>518817001
>So you acknowledge that kent was a good guy and nick attacked him because nicks a fed
please tell me where you got this from what i said lol, american reading comprehension in the toilet

>>518817240
Tucker called nick a fed for attacking Joe kent... you seem schizophrenic

>>518817410
for making joe kent lose*

me referencing that and you assuming i "acknowledge" that it makes nick a fed just makes you a retarded moron

you also played ignorant, pretending you didn't know he made joe kunt lose lol

weird!

>>518817410
January 6 proved Nick was a fed

>>518817740
he wasnt on the grounds, he wasn't charged, he's had no contact with feds, didn't turn anything over (all of this is on record and under oath aka threat of purjory) nobody where he was standing was busted, his speech was protected by the constitution.
he's answered this 1000 times and you retards just keep circling back to square 1, ignoring everything you are told because your minds work like a flowchart. you are an NPC.

>>518817654
What else could it mean? You explain to me why else nick would lobby against a republican in Washington, which they desperately need, in favor of a Democrat latina Marie Gluesenkamp Perez. We both know its only because Joe kent disavowed nick fuentes and Nick got his feelings hurt.
Still clinging to this idea that you actually affected that election is pretty pathetic too.

>>518818097
>What else could it mean?
you mean besides referencing what tucker said? do you think referencing what someone says means you agree with the content of what they are saying? this exchange is unbelievable so far lmao
>smartest americoon

>>518813888
your mom's a fkn abbo mate

>>518818097
>Still clinging to this idea that you actually affected that election is pretty pathetic too.
hey that was tucker and nicks other pathetic detractors saying it, maybe you should take it up with them?

>>518818245
He never said thats why he lost. He said it was despicable that he attacked him in the first place.
Ill ask again because you attempted to dodge it. Explain to me why else nick would lobby against a republican in Washington, which they desperately need, in favor of a Democrat latina Marie Gluesenkamp Perez? You think that was a good thing nick did? Or was it just petty faggotry.

>>518817410
You didn't listen to the why, which Nick said cause Kent is jewish and it's weird that only jees are seemingly allowed to criticize israel

>>518814075
dont be a spaz

>>518818564
>He never said thats why he lost. He said it was despicable that he attacked him in the first place.
so why would he care in the first place? almost like he made it happen? LOL
>Explain to me why else nick would lobby against a republican in Washington
because nicks only condition for supporting joe kent was him not disavowing him later. he did, knowing that nick and the groypers would retaliate - and then they made him pay for disavowing, just like he said they would.
you have this retarded idea that you have to be a die hard republican (a group that never does anything for white people) even when they shit on you publicly, or you're a democrat. that political system is custom tailored for retards like you, who can only think in false dichotomies.
>Or was it just petty faggotry.
the "petty faggotry" was joe kent getting nervous and disavowing them lmao, all he had to do was say nothing. attacking people in the public space has consequences, as joe kent well knows.

picrel is me playing the worlds tiniest violin for joe kent haha

>>518818965
Lol you've convinced yourself that your super high iq haven't you? All im seeing is some eceleb fangirl jumping through hoops to justify why his daddy lobbied against a republican in a district where Republicans are at a disadvantage.
This is the sad part though, but funny that you admit that nick attacked him not because of his policy or who he is as a man, but because he disavowed nick. Yet at the same time you'll bring up this shit about "republicans never do anything for white people!!" Nick thought differently when he fucking endorsed Joe kent didnt he, you stupid little fucking fagot. I wouldnt even let your retarded ass shine my shoes.

>>518819930
all im seeing is an angry npc with nick derangement syndrome. joe kent is a bitch and nick made him lose by mobilizing his based groyper army. you can forever seethe about it, bitch.

>>518820425
Lol you sound so defeated. Just take the L. You dont care about anything, youre just gay for nick, and its literally distorted your reality to the point where I believe youre developing schizophrenia based on our conversation. Its a shame because you dont seem dumb, just heavily misguided.

>>518821610
thats right bitch, stay in the realm of rhetoric, because all you niggers are capable of is talking around a subject. when you get into the details you start floundering immediately. absolutely pathetic.

>>518822010
Stop projecting. Im not even being mean. You're not retarded, but you're obsessed with this man, and it prevents you from being able to actually use your brain effectively. You can't have a real opinion on anything because everything must relate back to "how is this a genius maneuver by nick" when the reality is simple and right in front of your eyes. You cant see it though because everything is about defending nick with you. Which causes you to create this elaborate shit that isnt real and jump through hoop instead of acknowledging basic facts. Like nick lobbied against a republican in a district that desperately needs change because he got his feelings hurt.

>>518822710
tl;dr you bullshit too much

>>518822910
Allow me to truncate. Take nicks dick out of your mouth and maybe you'll be as intelligent as I.

>>518823413
whats funny about nicks detractors is you always find a way to make it gay. really deflates the accusation that he is. projection is a fine thing

>>518823582
What's gay is calling someone with a valid mild criticism a "nick detractor" lol reminds me of the belibers or the swifties. Same gay energy.
I mention projection and now you mention it? Its almost like im talking to a parrot. Don't you have thoughts of your own? Say something original or ill have to retract saying youre not retarded.

>>518824205
>mild criticism
>obfuscating, feigning ignorance, fed jacketing, character assassination
you project harder than a cinema you retard, you pretend im a fanboy but you're guilty of it yourself only in reverse. you love to hate nick. get over it.

Currently I can't see where things are going. It is strange that trump feels already like a lame duck
even if he is visible in charge makes decisions but somehow it is as if every major party is navigating around him and have already moved past him.

I can even see ambitions by miller, noem to make a bit for 2028 by shill activity thats crazy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIbzuVnegq0

>>518813620 (OP)
WOW COOL MORE MADE UP DRAMA BETWEEN TALKING FAGGOTS ONLINE

WE DID IT, HE MADE A POST WE WON BRO WE WON-
What did we win again?
Anyway time to send another $4 trillion to pissrael

the question is what ben shapiro is happy about
don't you guys get that this is the anomaly

- most hostages confirmed dead
- deal made
- palestine exist under some blair/trump mandate

so ben knows the deal is bullshit

>>518824770
If really wanted to criticise him I would point out that he endorsed Laura loomer (and she lost) or that he told people not to vote for trump (and he won). I could point those things out along with the fact that he tried to destroy Joe kent, and really paint a vivid picture of who nick is. I mean, has nick ever helped a republican get elected? You cant say mtg or gosar because nick tried to destroy them as well. He failed in those endeavors as well, by the way.

>>518813620 (OP)
Buy ad