Thread 518863669

No. I think you all still are missing it.

>>518863689
What am I missing?

>>518863669 (OP)
Rebirth of European paganism.

>>518864328
Ineffable physicality and ineffable spirit. Op seemingly posted this as bait entangled with the actual answer as well.

>>518864827
Indeed he did

>>518863669 (OP)
>pentacle is satanic
You retards are annoying.

you should replace atheism with Christianity

>>518863669 (OP)
nah, paganism

>>518863669 (OP)
So long as islam exists christianity serves everybody well by keeping them in check.

>>518863669 (OP)
We need advancements in the race sciences and the spread of racial consciousness. We don't need a religion, definitely not a foreign one.

>>518865943
Watch Adam Green. The Jews are setting up an apocalyptic war between Christians and Muslims. When that war comes, we should stay away.

>>518863669 (OP)
Replace Christianity with the one true Aryan faith.
Zoroastrianism.

A religion so righteous and true in it's message it managed to influence and alter Judaism, which is nuts considering we can all attest to how stubborn Jews are.

>>518866222
Checked

>>518866222
The Jews took whatever they found useful and discarded the rest. The tribal friend-enemy distinction (we are always good, the enemy is always bad), the paranoia stemming from a demon infested world, a savior that preserves hope, and an idea of cosmic justice as a cope for the plebs.
We don't need any of this because it creates a deeply conservative, risk-averse, schizophrenic people.

>>518866061
a religion is a shared value and narrative system
if we don't have a religion we don't have a "we"
it's the cultural glue that keeps ethical drift at bay.

an atheist religion that emphasized white power as the highest virtue was tried called creativity.
>huh? i've never heard of that.
exactly.
atheism and scientism can't sustain a people.

>>518867075
Christians needed centuries to achieve critical mass in Rome. They took over a millennium and multiple wars to take over Europe. White nationalist rhetoric is being normalized at a much faster rate. All we need is to keep pushing. Don't let anyone hijack our movement. If you give up, that's what will happen.

>>518867285
>White nationalist rhetoric is being normalized
among Christians.
atheists are still almost universally screechy marxists besides the handful of you on /pol/ and adam green's twitter replies.

how do you even hold your position?
>God does not exist
>therefore, the universe was not created with intent
>therefore, there is no right or wrong way to live your life
>[???]
>therefore, we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children
how do you bridge this gap?

>>518867654
It's not that complicated.
>There are separate, competing races.
>We must do what is best for our race.
>While preserving our unique racial culture.
The Chinese already have it figured out.
https://jrnyquist.blog/2019/09/11/the-secret-speech-of-general-chi-haotian/
The same ideas apply here, except we don't need to turn into a turbocommie dystopia.

>>518867654
Try reading the Dao De Jing and Zhuangzi

One such concept is Wuwei (無為), also known as non-action/effortless action.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0rhN8U14dk

Heck, the "do nothing, win" and "nothing ever happens" memes are just inspirations of the Way/道.

>>518868215
>there are separate, competing races
this is a descriptive claim
>we must do what is best for our race
this is prescriptive command, an ought.

you've provided no bridge between them. why MUST we?
according to what higher principle?
in a godless, purposeless universe, why is 'what is best for our race' the supreme good instead of 'what is best for me' or 'maximizing my own pleasure?'

and if our unity is based on a racial 'us vs them,' what happens when there's no immediate 'them?'
what is the positive vision that holds your society together in peacetime?
'racial consciousness' alone is a recipe for perpetual internal purges as people inevitably disagree on what's 'best for the race' means and start accusing eachother of being heretical traitors.
you're building on sand.

>>518863669 (OP)
Taoism isnt "satanic"? And the vast majority of people arent capable of taoism, not because the lessons arent accessible, but because most people need some metaphysical authority to boss them around from an ethical and productivity standpoint.

>>518868336
The Zhuangzi is my favorite. Man talks a lot of shit, and it's surprisingly funny. Remember folks, be like my nigga Ding The Butcher, and not like Ugly Horsehead.

>>518868662
There's no functional difference between "God created" and "there is". All claims of createdness are descriptive claims. If they aren't, they're fiction/lies.
Racial consciousness comes from an awareness of racial competition. Where does class consciousness come from?
You can only maximize (or minimize) your own pleasure within a framework where those values are protected. It's like valuing free speech and welcoming Chinese domination. Your life can't be a living contradiction.
Racial consciousness is not about wiping out other races. It's a recognition that separate races exist and that they are in competition. We don't need to purge anything. Eating sushi isn't heresy against the White race. Defecting to a racial enemy and working with them against us is.
And this is a virtually meaningless argument. We are already aware that we will never be Mongolian. All we need is to make everyone else aware that that they will never be European.

>>518869674
My dude has been reading evola.

>>518868336
if the goal is preserving a specific racial identity, how does that align with the dao de jing's emphasis on dissolving distinctions and categories?
doesn't the dao caution against rigid labels like 'our race' and 'their race,' suggesting that such divisions give rise to conflict and imbalance?
>>518869674
>There's no functional difference between "God created" and "there is".
absolutely wrong.
"God created" implies telos (purpose, intent). "there is" is a brute fact.
the first can be the source of an 'ought' (a knife ought to be sharp because it was created to cut) it can ground the truth value of moral claims.
the second cannot logically lead to an 'ought' without a further value judgment. the existence of cancer doesn't mean we ought to have it.

your framework is circular. you say i can only maximize my pleasure within a protected framework, and that framework must be racial. why?
why under naturalism is the racial group the fundamental unit of value?
why not protect a framework of individual rights or a constitutional republic or a community based on shared ideas?
you're simply asserting that race is the primary framework without justifying why it ought to be.

>>518870226
>the second cannot logically lead to an 'ought' without a further value judgment.
Don't worry, I've got plenty of further value judgments and they're all binding because I said so.

>>518870505
stirner would've said "the white race" is a spook