>>518883543 (OP)
Cool except for the fact “woke right” is literally just a Zionist slur implying anyone on the right supporting Palestine or even remaining neutral over the Gaza conflict is like a liberal who wants to cut his dick off and take BBC
>>518883860
woke right is a schmittian strawman
it conflates rightwing opposition to liberalism with leftwing opposition to it, has an exception for israel and sets the fight as mortal danger and existential
james lindsay the pro gay liberal atheist has found a way to call christian nationalist nazis
>>518883543 (OP)
interesting but the issue i think is not a lack of a word but rather the inability to keep things personal. i am reminded of all the various "debates" that debatefags have, f rom the "prove me wrong" shit to other spectacles. you know the drill: big brain on the stage with the cameras on him, volunteers walking up to the mic to "challenge" them. but the subject matters almost always take place outside and above the two speakers in a nebulous region called ideology. right? the speakers never speak for themselves, about themselves, as such we are forced to create terms that really only serve to help us further avoid our own association with ideological beliefs. so i rate this new term 3/10
>>518884506
furthermore people in political debates are NEVER the leaders, spokesman, or figureheads of any ideology. not even the president or congress can present themselves as such. but so often debatefags DO present themselves as the leaders and therefore the debate HAS to drift out into the ether of monolithic friends and enemies. if people realize they represent nothing but themselves we would have an easier time debating