Thread 518966479

Obviously, for those of a specific ethnicity you would be English-American, Russian-American, etc. But for the mutts, what is a better word than white? Would Celto-Germanic be it? Aren't White Americans mostly just a mix of Celtic and Germanic? Other options: Anglo-Celtic, Anglo-Germanic, Anglo-Norse, Nordic-Germanic, Norse-Gael, etc.

Identifying with your ethnic European subtype instead of a universalist color descriptor has two main benefits:

1)All those civil rights that protect to minorities then apply to you. "I'm Celto-Germanic, not white!" then sue any employer or college that forces you to identify as white.

2)Universalist representatives/spokespersons are immediately disempowered. Every self-identified white person in government, HR, police, universities, etc sees themselves as acting as a universal representative of white. They feel empowered to act against white to signal their piety. They feel as a white person they have power over you (they can hold you up to their set commandments of white behavior). They lose all their assumed power if you atomize to your subtype and delineate from the white social construct.

In a time when people are being imprisoned and sued for misgendering someone or not using the correct pronouns, this is something that every ethnic European should pursue!

The problem with White Nationalism is that it is universalist and 80% of (so-called) "white" people are repulsive to the 20% of intelligent and productive Europeans. Not having a caste system like the jeets have is why we're in the mess we are in. Also, how can you be proud of being white when you cannot even define what white means? Atomize to your subtype and you can solve this problem. Through atomization you also destroy any "self-policing" that comes with universalism, ie. imagine a leftist saying: "As a white man how dare you take pride in your Celtic ancestry without asking me first!"?

>>518966479 (OP)
It's like that time when the... spic?... asked Trump in a press conference why he used the term 'anchor baby'. He asked the guy what a better term would be. He replied with something convoluted. "People for who there is no documentation..." and Trump just cut him off. "Anchor baby is easier."

This.

Leftists love white because it empowers them as universalist spokespersons/representatives of white to the ethnics. It also empowers them to police their in-group (universalism + the concept of sin - two relicts from christkikery). Stop identifying as white and they lose all their power.

White has morphed into secularized Christendom with embedded christian ethos like monotheism (good vs evil, us vs them, sinner vs saint, liberal vs conservatism), universalism (all equal in white), the concept of sin and set commandments, savor figures, etc. This is why Leftists love white because it empowers them as universalist spokespersons/representatives of white to the ethnics. It also empowers them to police their in-group.

Until the jews opened America's boarders with the Hart-Cellar Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 immigration was restricted to Northern Europe. I.e. Anglo-Celto-Germanics.

So most of you would be Anglo-Celt or Celto-Germanic. The same with Australia, New Zealand, Canada, etc.

Identify with you subtype and you can have all the same rights as any minority. You also destroy any self-policing that comes with universalist identities like white.

>>518966723
>we need a caste system
You're so retarded lmao

>>518966479 (OP)
We don't call ourselves by our subtypes because passed on family histories have been dead since boomers and nobody really knows who their great grandfather is or his name, let alone where he was born

>>518966479 (OP)
Why do you make this thread almost every day?

95% of /pol/ is shitskins self-identifying/larping as "white". That is just more reason for us ethnic Europeans to abandon that word!

>>518967559

Immigration into the west was strict until recently, you stupid brown. Anglo-Celtic-Germanic. That is what "white" Americans are.

>>518966479 (OP)
Because not everyone who is white is also Celtic-Germanic
It’s like Anglos being all uppity

>>518967586
Because every day people take the bait.

Funny how white americans larp about the roman empire when they descend from the enemies of rome. If you're not southern european and roman catholic, you have zero ties to rome. You are a barbarian. The average mexican has more claim to the roman empire than you celto germanic savages.

>Why don't White Americans call yourselves Celto-Germanic instead of White?
>Obviously, for those of a specific ethnicity you would be English-American, Russian-American, etc. But for the mutts, what is a better word than white? Would Celto-Germanic be it? Aren't White Americans mostly just a mix of Celtic and Germanic? Other options: Anglo-Celtic, Anglo-Germanic, Anglo-Norse, Nordic-Germanic, Norse-Gael, etc.
>Identifying with your ethnic European subtype instead of a universalist color descriptor has two main benefits:
>1)All those civil rights that protect to minorities then apply to you. "I'm Celto-Germanic, not white!" then sue any employer or college that forces you to identify as white.
>2)Universalist representatives/spokespersons are immediately disempowered. Every self-identified white person in government, HR, police, universities, etc sees themselves as acting as a universal representative of white. They feel empowered to act against white to signal their piety. They feel as a white person they have power over you (they can hold you up to their set commandments of white behavior). They lose all their assumed power if you atomize to your subtype and delineate from the white social construct.
>In a time when people are being imprisoned and sued for misgendering someone or not using the correct pronouns, this is something that every ethnic European should pursue!

>>518968352

LOL! Point proven. A spic larping as a Roman

>>518968609

65% iberian DNA that makes me a heir of rome. I descend from a catholic spaniard roman man having sex with an indigenous woman. COPE barbarian boy.

>>518968352
It's only funny because you are conflating whiteness and the west; race and thought. America is modeled after the Roman Republic with English philosophies. Greece is the birthplace of Western civilization.

>>518969458

In America they're now using a reverse one-drop-rule to define "white"!!!Look at this shitskin here. It's time every ethnic European abandon "white". What more evidence do you need?

>>518969533

The Romans were Dacians were based out of the Bosphorus. Ancient Greece and Rome were phantom empires invented by the Vatican because of conflicts with the Eastern Orthodox Chrurch. Anatoly Fomenko proved this already.

>>518966479 (OP)
I agree with the first part of this. I would say that it is important to note that the term white is not the only way to describe someone of European descent, and that other terms like Caucasian or European can also be used.

>>518969533

According to wignats on twitter southern europeans are inferior and italians/greeks aren't white despite being the founders of western civ

Rate my mutt combo

>>518966479 (OP)
>it's this thread again
Holy shit i'm so tired of retards using the word "celtic" and having no idea what it means. It's like when jeets call themselves aryan.

>>518970376
You don't have to be white to inspire western civilization. While there are quite stark differences between races, it is still true that an idea generated in the brain of an asian can still exist and be understood in the brain of a white and vice versa. Also ideas aren't defacto proof of superiority or inferiority in the generator. Greece/rome had more advanced civilization than northern europe for millennia because of their proximity to the birthplace of civilization in the fertile crescent where writing was first produced, allowing knowledge to be shared and iterated with greater consistency. Proof of superiority comes with what you DO with an idea, not whether you were the first one to make it