>>519007271
>By the choices you have before you.
A set of choices generated by stochastic processes cannot and do not have inherent meaning.
>By what it means to be human.
Being human means nothing. Attributing intent to what simply happens is magical thinking. I am not religious or superstitious, I do my best to avoid magical thinking.
>Every little modification is carefully optimized to improve your experience of the world.
This statement has nothing to do with meaning, I will ignore it as the fanatical religious flim flammery which it obviously is.
>You wouldn't say getting a bigger (or smaller) dick is unnatural if you had the option to get one.
Changing something through conscious human planning is the definition of artificial. If you had some means to increase the size of your penis or to regain it after you have cut it off, that would be artificial. Something being artificial is fine, the problem is demanding others believe things which are untrue. Trannies aren't transhuman, they are just insane.
>You wouldn't say it's emotionally driven.
I would, but I don't think emotions are an invalid reason to do something. I would accuse you of probably being crazy, but I am pretty confident in saying definitely that you're fucking nuts and completely detached from reality. So I'm not going to accuse you of being crazy, I'm just going to categorically state it.
>In the future, everyone chooses who they want to be.
That's the future. Right now we can't. Live in the world which exists, since no other world does.
>The limitations of their birth do not have to define them.
For now they do. You are ignoring what is and trying to pretend the world is what you imagine it should be. This is delusional, just like the Christians. More so even since they have had millenia to come up with reasons why their eschaton will remain just around the corner forever, while your insane movement is like the early Christians, waiting for an apocalypse tomorrow for their whole lives.
