>>519031004
Sure. However to play devil's advocate, recall that Czechia had been a part of "Germany" for a nearly thousand years in the HRE. To Hitler it was in a way returning to the status quo, specially since it was a protectorate and retained some internal autonomy.
Hitler's ambitions were not purely innocent. He definitely did want to expand Germany's border eastward. In my opinion he was willing to negotiate with the Poles as he did, over Danzig, and then form an anti-USSR alliance in which Eastern Europe would necessarily enter into Germany's sphere of influence, as the most powerful and industrial nation in Europe. However, if the Poles were not willing to play along, he was more than happy to use that as an excuse for conquest. In this case of Western Poland.
And the USSR is interesting. Geopolitical realities forced him into invading the USSR when he did, and it was the right decision. However, he also definitely did want to attack the USSR anyway, to destroy "Judeo-Bolshevism", and to "secure" the valuable Eastern territories, in particular the Ukraine. He also spoke about colonizing Crimea (at the time it was Tatar and was being ethnically cleansed by the Soviet state), and in Table Talks also mused about settler towns in European Russia (incl. Ukraine, Belarus).