Thread 519073371

Do they ever amount to anything? The most monumental people in history were those who had few words but took incredible action.

>broads are mouthy no matter the profession

Not really shocked tbqhwyf

>>519073371 (OP)
Brevity is the soul of wit or some shit.

>>519073371 (OP)
Republicans are low IQ retards who can't debate
Democrats have endless facts and data to back up their arguments though

>>519073746
No one believes that anymore.

>>519073746
This hook isn't even baited.

>>519073371 (OP)
Das rite a black woman is talkin’. Listen and learn.

>>519073371 (OP)

BHWA HAH HAH HAH

Clarence Thomas was so smart he said nearly nothing for like 30 years. But dumb broads cant keep their mouths shut.

>>519073371 (OP)
>Be stenographer
>Get paid per word
>Eating well right now

Can you unironically shut it down?

>>519073771
LEL

>>519073371 (OP)
Play the clip where Justice Jackson called niggers retards

>>519073371 (OP)
This is a pretty good article on this I read today: https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/
>The field that frightens me most is the law. All of us depend on a functioning legal system, and, to be blunt, the rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female. The rule of law is not just about writing rules down. It means following them even when they yield an outcome that tug at your heartstrings or runs contrary to your gut sense of which party is more sympathetic.

>A feminized legal system might resemble the Title IX courts for sexual assault on college campuses established in 2011 under President Obama. These proceedings were governed by written rules and so technically could be said to operate under the rule of law. But they lacked many of the safeguards that our legal system holds sacred, such as the right to confront your accuser, the right to know what crime you are accused of, and the fundamental concept that guilt should depend on objective circumstances knowable by both parties, not in how one party feels about an act in retrospect. These protections were abolished because the people who made these rules sympathized with the accusers, who were mostly women, and not with the accused, who were mostly men.

>These two approaches to the law clashed vividly in the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings. The masculine position was that, if Christine Blasey Ford can’t provide any concrete evidence that she and Kavanaugh were ever in the same room together, her accusations of rape cannot be allowed to ruin his life. The feminine position was that her self-evident emotional response was itself a kind of credibility that the Senate committee must respect.

>>519074925
>If the legal profession becomes majority female, I expect to see the ethos of Title IX tribunals and the Kavanaugh hearings spread. Judges will bend the rules for favored groups and enforce them rigorously on disfavored groups, as already occurs to a worrying extent. It was possible to believe back in 1970 that introducing women into the legal profession in large numbers would have only a minor effect. That belief is no longer sustainable. The changes will be massive.

>>519073371 (OP)
>MUP DA DOO DIDDA PO MO GUB BIDDA BE DAT TUM MUHFUGEN BIX NOOD COF BIN DUB HO MUHFUGGA

>>519073371 (OP)
Show the graph how many unique words each used, suddenly the graph is reversed..

>>519074651
I just saw that. Fucking wonderful that the dumbest Supreme Court justice in history called everyone that looks like her 'disabled'.

>>519073371 (OP)
I like how they made John Roberts intersex, lol

>>519074925
>such as the right to confront your accuser, the right to know what crime you are accused of, and the fundamental concept that guilt should depend on objective circumstances knowable by both parties, not in how one party feels about an act in retrospect.
It truly is insane. Also, they forgot the most important part, the presumption of innocent is inverted and becomes the presumption of guilt.
So you have to prove your innocence to a crime you aren't allowed to know against an accuser you aren't allowed to know or confront. Then when the secret court inevitably finds you "not innocent" your life is ruined. This is the exact sort of court system that U.S. broke away from, but even in those days it was only really used against political enemies/enemies of the king and not against literally everyone.