Anonymous
(ID: lPOBWtzf)
10/17/2025, 7:11:51 AM
No.519094132
>>519094176
>>519094334
>>519094480
>>519094522
>>519094943
>>519095005
>>519095659
>>519095675
>>519095808
>>519095810
>>519095870
>>519096245
>>519096296
>>519096377
>>519096651
>>519096695
>>519097573
>>519099151
>>519099175
>>519100262
>>519100674
how am i supposed to like ANY part of FEMALE behavior?
i obsessively get turned on by women's bodies but i see ZERO positives to their uniquely feminine behaviors:
>incapable of rational, original, or independent thought
>always follows the crowd, spineless, caves to social pressure
>overly emotional and unpredictable
>catty, jealous, passive aggressive, covetous
>feelings-based ontology
>generally lower iq/less intelligent
>less coordinated and more susceptible to anxiety
>lispy shrill speech with up-speak
how is ANYTHING about uniquely female behavior desirable?
why aren't tomboys (behaviorally male, physically female) not the ideal standard then?
what male actually enjoys spending time with women as opposed to their male friends for any reason beyond the possibility of fucking the woman?
i'm convinced any man who would prefer a woman's company in a non-sexual context is either spiritually a woman or just an actual faggot.
why aren't tomboys the ideal standard?
i don't want to date some useless, shrill, overly emotional dependent who expects me to pay for everything and have to tolerate her useless non-intellectual speech.
i want to date someone who adds value like i do but just happens to have a female body for baby making.
>incapable of rational, original, or independent thought
>always follows the crowd, spineless, caves to social pressure
>overly emotional and unpredictable
>catty, jealous, passive aggressive, covetous
>feelings-based ontology
>generally lower iq/less intelligent
>less coordinated and more susceptible to anxiety
>lispy shrill speech with up-speak
how is ANYTHING about uniquely female behavior desirable?
why aren't tomboys (behaviorally male, physically female) not the ideal standard then?
what male actually enjoys spending time with women as opposed to their male friends for any reason beyond the possibility of fucking the woman?
i'm convinced any man who would prefer a woman's company in a non-sexual context is either spiritually a woman or just an actual faggot.
why aren't tomboys the ideal standard?
i don't want to date some useless, shrill, overly emotional dependent who expects me to pay for everything and have to tolerate her useless non-intellectual speech.
i want to date someone who adds value like i do but just happens to have a female body for baby making.