>>519157739
I've seen some of the same lie about other things. Mike From Pa, aka twitch.tv/centralcommittee, for instance, lied about the Charlie Girk shooter being a groyper because of the belle ciao bullet casing. He was one of the ones primarily pushing that line, and his followers amplified it out everywhere.
The only reason he had to lie like that, was because it would potentially hurt his political rivals, aka the far right, and help the far left by obfuscating who really shot kirk. For the next several days everyone was claiming it was a far right groyper, until more evidence came out that showed it was total bullshit. By that point all the left wing spaces already believed it was a groyper, and they had propagandized all of reddit with that lie.
Its no different here. Hasan being a dog abuser hurts the left wing, so they are willing to knowingly lie about the evidence everyone can see with their own eyes. So the same guy, Mike from PA, supposedly loves dogs. He had a dog of his own that he loved, who died of cancer. But here, hes all in on defending Hasans animal abuse, because his viewership is downstream of Hasans viewership, and also defending Hasan will help the left wing.
I can see that people will lie for their own financial and political careers. It just becomes egregious at some point. Do the ends justify the means? If they will lie about bullshit like this, what else would they lie about, that wasn't caught?