>>519206373
Nuclear war is beneficial to the USA. It would make the US population 90% White after the cities are obliterated. The population of the USA is more spread out unlike the population of China which is mostly along their coast. Ethnic Russians would be functionally extinct after Moscow and Saint Petersburg are nuked. Pakistan and India would nuke each other. In the event of a nuclear war the USA would nuke countries like Brazil and Mexico that aren’t even actively involved in the conflict as a contingency measure to make sure they don’t rise up in the power vacuum after the war.
>>519206079
houthis have cost effective drones and access to hypersonic missiles. we dont have shit but aircraft carriers that would be sunk to worldwide cheers if we used them for blockading shipping lanes. a few chinese destroyers with hypersonics would make short work of an aircraft carrier battle group.
>>519208571
Battleships and aircraft carriers are obsolete, the future of naval warfare will be very small vessels armed with drones. The USA will be arming pirates with such equipment and the just-in-time supply chain will be broken indefinitely. Any country that isn’t self sufficient in oil, fertilizer, and food is doomed.
>>519205880 (OP)
I believe China can collapse the USA more easily. They have a lot more population, and they are becoming more and more powerful. China could easily take over the US if they wanted to. They could do it by invading the US, or by buying up all the US's assets.