>>519246007 (OP)
Nobody finds it suspicious that the further an object is from Earth the faster science claims it is moving. Or that the farther it is the huger it is compared to anything in our solar system. The distances are clearly a lie.
>>519250989
Well, obviously you find it suspicious. The reason why they claim it's bigger is because, well, it is. What are your specific arguments against the traditional model?
>>519250989
You ever think that may we can only see the bigger objects when they're far away?
And objects that have been whipped by gravity of massive stars would go faster than objects in our solar system that are stuck in gravitational pull?