>>519263961 (OP)
This verse has been DEBUNKED. The oldest post that references this falsehood is LITERALLY from a Kike
This narration is NOT describing a sexual assault, and the wording โูุฑูุจูู ุฑุณูู ุงููู ๏ทบโ is being misunderstood.
Let me break it down clearly:
---
1. This report appears in Musnad Aแธฅmad under the narrations of สฟAbdullฤh ibn Masสฟลซd.
Yes โ the story is real, and its chain is considered authentic.
Butโฆ
What is actually happening in the report is a supernatural encounter with non-human beings, not humans attacking him, and certainly not a sexual act.
---
2. Who are โุงูุฒุทูโ here?
The narrator says:
> ูุฃููู
ุงูุฒุทู
โAs if they were zuttโ
This is a simile, not identification. The phrase โูุฃููู
โ means โas thoughโ or โas if.โ
And even then, Ibn Masสฟลซd admits uncertainty and says "ุฃู ูู
ุง ูุงู" multiple times โ signaling hesitation and approximation about what they were.
The Prophet himself clarifies at the end:
> "ูู
ููุฑ ู
ู ุงูู
ูุงุฆูุฉ"
โThey are a group of angels.โ
or
> โThey are from the angels, as Allah willed.โ
This completely removes the idea that these are actual Zutt tribesmen.
---
3. The phrase โูุฑูุจูู ุฑุณูู ุงููู ๏ทบโ โ what does it mean?
The Arabic verb ุฑูููุจู has many usages beyond physical mounting. It can mean:
>to surround
>to press upon
>to come over or upon
>to overwhelm
>to get close to physically
>to pile onto (in a metaphoric or non-sexual sense)
In classical Arabic, it does not inherently imply a sexual act, especially with angels and prophetic contexts.
Context shows what happened:
The Prophet was reciting Qurโan to them the whole time.
After they left, he felt ุซูููุงู ูุฌูุนุงู โ โheavy and fatiguedโ โ a typical reaction to spiritual encounters (like revelation).
At dawn they departed.
Later a different group came in white garments.
Nothing here is sexual, physical, or abusive.