>>519292353
>cult
When people disagree with a destructive plan to replace them with cheap, criminal labor from a culture that hates ours, it's not a cult.
I'd argue that your resistance to anything that would protect you from predatory people who hate you places you in a suicide cult.
You not understanding the motivations of a people doesn't place them in a cult; it means you're ignorant. You're missing the information that would allow you empathy, and therefore, understanding. Since you're not very smart, this disconnect triggers anger and violence, not discourse. You don't care why the other side thinks like they do, or you assume instantly that the motivation is evil, when 99% of the world wants a safe place to raise kids. There is middle ground from which to build understanding, but you don't want to understand. You want to hate. I try CONSTANTLY to understand the leftist mentality, and the only bases I can reach are that they don't really know why they're angry, though their anger is valid. They don't understand the reality of what it takes to get from where we are to where they want to be, but they cannot describe what they want out of life. They can only pick an issue and RAGE about it, but cannot place it in context with the rest of a functioning world. They are so overwhelmed with pity for people they assume are just poor and seeking better lives that there CANNOT BE ANY negative consequences from it, and if there are, it's worth the sacrifices, yet they ridicule Charlie Kirk for saying that you have to tolerate some gun violence in order to keep our freedom to have them. They also incorrectly interpr4et this to mean to say that sometimes it's ok for people to die so we can keep the means of killing. He meant that you cannot control all factors. Freedoms are responsibility, and inevitably, some people will abuse the freedom, but the exception is not enough to remove the freedom from the rest of the population.