>>519302327
>i never seem to meet anyone who actually likes any of it or wants it.
In my experience whether you ask a 60yo boomer, a 20yo zoomer or a 35yo millennial, whether man or woman, almost everyone is positively icked out by it except for a handful of the kind of people that make you utterly terrified with their reasoning.
>It's great, i can't see so good no more since i turned 75
or
>That saved me 3 times driving home blackout drunk last weekend, love it
or even
>Lane keeping and automatic braking are so convenient for when you're texting!
So basically only the people who have no business being on the road like it. Almost all of them are really really old or addicts or turboroasties. Wish it wasn't so but this is /pol/ where you can point that out.
>>519302997
>>519303706
Yeah i think so too, plenty of based autists willing to step up demand, question is if regulators will allow it. They could make it prohibitively expensive to get such parts certified. As for us EUfags the eurocrats are seriously floating laws making it illegal to repair a vehicle that dips below a certain monetary value or mechanical condition. They backed out last time but the argument that "end of life vehicles" being reconditioned stalls fleet turnover and violates their agenda to make the crap they mandated universal will resurface periodically. For the EU a "classic" is something in pristine condition that stands around 99% of the time and is driven to and from events like 3 times a year. Like the Porsches these assholes own, or Bidens Corvette. Everything else is a pebble in the shoe of their Demolition Man utopia that has got to go.
>>519303851
You guys are lucky you can do this. Here there are yearly inspections you must subject your vehicle to and if any unapproved modifications are detected, you fail, your plates are revoked and you get fined like 10k for environmental vandalism. You're stuck with whatever it had when new.