>>519345090
>place in the Quran
Its in Sahih Al-Bukhari, it has nothing to do with the Quran. You're some lying faggot lmao.
For anyone that doesnt understand:
>QURAN IS HOLY TEXT
>QURAN LACKS ALMOST ALL CONTEXT
>NAMES ARE OMITTED, TIMELINE SKIPS ALL OVER THE PLACE, MUHAMMAD HIMSELF ONLY MENTIONED TWICE BY NAME
This presents a problem. The solution? Hadiths!
>Hadiths are essentially the missing context, and what make the Quran make any sort of sense
>There are ranks to Hadiths, some considered on par in authority to the Quran, some not so much
>Hadiths that are considered (by Sunni Muslims anyway) to be on par with the Quran in terms of authority and authenticity are referred to as Sahih (meaning sound or trusted and verified narration)
>These are Hadith collects like Sahih Al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, etc
>As a Sunni, to deny these would be Haram
>To try and add words to these hadiths, or the Quran, is Haram
I give this as a gift to those who want to shit on Muslims more accurately. Remember, if they deny a Sahih Hadith either makes them Shia, or kuffar, which is Islam's version of a heretic and in most muslim countries is illegal. In some it results in death.
Shias, however, have an entirely different view and don't accept most hadiths. Also they really fucking hate Aisha which is funny to me.