>>519525776
>>519525822
Yes. By an order of magnitude. And if you could read, it's what I said. Why? Because you dont have science faggots dicking around trying to inflate numbers, you have a generational motherplant with first or second generation clones, and a local operation is more or less idiot proof if they're patient, but a massive industrial warehouse is run by an MBA with a spreadsheet who might get antsy if curing is taking too long or they have "production issues". 
And again, for a second time, you are arguing semantics using an analogue, when my entire point is that shit is a scam designed to trick retards, because you are selecting for a single variable on a technicality and pretending it's the whole experience, then bickering that "thca is technically thc", when my argument is that even optimized thc content is SHIT because it's a fraction of the experience. Go smoke diamonds without the sauce. It'll be immediately obvious.