Thread 519807303

If the earth is a spinning ball, why can a helicopter hover on a same place for hours and the earth below it will stay in the same position?

thread will 404 momentarily
before it does

>>519807303 (OP)
Because the atmosphere spins with it

Actually it doesn't. To balance the coreolis effect caused by the earth's rotation you have to counter steer over time.

>>519807775
>Because the atmosphere spins with it
where does it stop spinning?
so no Coriolis?
you retards can't get your propaganda straight.

>>519807822
>Actually it doesn't. To balance the coreolis effect caused by the earth's rotation you have to counter steer over time.
you do have to 'counter steer' but not for the reasons you claim

>>519807949
boom gottem

>>519807303 (OP)
The Earth is flat. Aliens are demons. Jesus is the Lord.

>>519807984
Coriolis effect only happens when you move towards or away from Earth's axis of rotation. If the hot air balloon goes up or down it's indeed subject to the Coriolis effect, but it descends/ascends slowly so the effect is very weak. None of it applies when it's stationary.
Coriolis effect is also visible when you move north/south a long distance, since that also moves you towards/away from the axis of rotation. Mass of air in northern hemisphere moves hundreds of kilometres south -> moves away from the axis -> has less rotational velocity relative to position -> air starts being pulled to the west.

>>519807303 (OP)
how do flat earthers feel about science fiction and space operas?

>>519807303 (OP)
go back to /x/, we have a containment board for a reason.

>ITT: (((Retards)))
"Flat earth" does not mean "disc in space with a dome created by a jesus"
>HONK

>Bye now
HONK!

>>519807705
you aren't censored, you're just a gagglefuck of morons who don't have enough money to test your hypothesis (because you're too stupid to earn honest money)

>>519808430
>Coriolis effect doesn't helicopters but doe effect bullets
lol

>>519808553
>"Flat earth" does not mean "disc in space
based
>with a dome created by a jesus"
wrong.

Jesus was Jewish and God doesn't exist.

>>519808643
>you aren't censored,
lol
would hit harder if you were literally paid to counter signal us you fucking retard.

>>519808822
>flat earth thread
>belter seethes about Christ and religion
kinda on the nose cabal-bro.

This is what flat earthers think the earth looks like. Teehee.

>>519809111
Most Flat Earthers on this board are Latinx Christcucks.

>>519808275
>The Earth is flat. Aliens are demons. Jesus is the Lord.
SIMPLE
AS

>>519809300
Based.

>>519808704
Coriolis effect doesn't affect things that stand still relative to the Earth. Even in case of a moving helicopter, it moves much slower compared to the bullet and is subject to a bunch of forces compared to simple gravity + air resistance of the bullet so the effect is much less noticeable.

>>519809284
>Most Flat Earthers on this board are Latinx Christcucks.
>Christcucks
kike
>doesn't check tr!ps
fuck off sly you're fat.
aren't you supposed to be in Arkansas you fat bitch?

>>519809669
>Coriolis effect doesn't affect things that stand still relative to the Earth.
circular logic.
The earth is unmoving.

>>519808704
Also, check out what Foucault's pendulum is.

>>519809277
nope

>>519809762
>Also, check out what Foucault's pendulum is.
a literal scam

>>519809840
>If I mock the argument, I don't have to refute it
lmao
>>519809760
Do you have any understanding on what Coriolis effect is? On any spinning object, not just Earth? If you don't, I can explain it to you.

>>519810146
>lmao
I learned it from watching you faggot.

>>519810146
>Do you have any understanding on what Coriolis effect is?
yes
horse shit

>>519809076
that's not censorship, retard. That's a statement. Now, if youtube deleted every video for the daring opinion of being a flat earther, that'd be a bit closer to censorship, but you are free to find hundreds of flat earth videos on youtube. At least, in western nations you are.

>>519807303 (OP)
Read this post:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Retconned/comments/1m0px7o/attention_at_least_one_rapture_has_already/

Alt URL (redirects to the post):

https://www.truth-now.org

From the post:
>And don't be deceived by the fact that the masses aren't talking about this info. In actuality, this info is the most important thing on the planet right now—by far. Nothing else even comes close.

>>519810201
>I am above those sheep who decide the truth by what it is mocked and what is not
>Therefore I'll decide the truth by mocking what I think is false
Are you aware what you're doing?
>>519810238
Nevermind, you're a typical proud-of-his-ignorance mutt.

>>519810251
>that's not censorship,
yes it is
> That's a statement.
that's a thumb on the scale
the Truth doesn't need it, only lies do.
> Now, if youtube deleted every video for the daring opinion of being a flat earther,
most flat earth videos were totally shadowbanned from their search for years.
> that'd be a bit closer to censorship
no that's also just censorship.
> but you are free to find hundreds of flat earth videos on youtube.
not with YouTube Search you aren't.
> At least, in western nations you are.
lol
what a bitch

>>519810380
>Read this post:
go back

>>519810380
And the mind-blowing "Wizard of Oz" connection...

https://www.reddit.com/r/Retconned/comments/1oeummk/was_the_wizard_of_oz_nothing_more_than_an/

>>519809813
Yep!

>>519810413
>Nevermind, you're a typical proud-of-his-ignorance mutt.
you still cannot produce a single verifiable piece of evidence for curvature
and you never will
because none exist.

>>519810471
we don't believe in space.

>>519807303 (OP)
Glitch in the simulation.

If you're standing in a bullet train traveling 500 mph and you are holding a watermelon, and drop the watermelon in front of you, the watermelon, which is also moving 500mph drops directly to your feet and may not even break. Now do the same except drop the watermelon out of the window, watermelon is suddenly not moving at 500mph anymore, and you're 200 feet away from it when it hits the ground and explodes to smitherines.

Science will explain this with anglo Saxon symbols, but it is a glitch. The game did not anticipate such speeds for human player. Plain and simple.

>>519810420
>>519810450
>>519810493
>>519810537
imagine buying a 4chan pass to espouse this shlock.
>>519810493
You will deny every piece of evidence anyone throws at you, even evidence you see with your own eyes. you're a retard.

hey what's the benefit of keeping flat earth secret from us normies? Just asking because if there's money in keeping this secret, I want in

>>519810584
>imagine buying a 4chan pass to espouse this shlock.
I would NEVER
namefags get the rope.
>You will deny every piece of evidence anyone throws at you, even evidence you see with your own eyes. you're a retard.
I haven't had the chance to, you've produced zero.
The word you're looking for is 'refute' I would 'refute' whatever evidence you produce which is why you don't bother.
BITCH

>>519810670
>hey what's the benefit of keeping flat earth secret from us normies?
see >>519809111
and picrel

>>519807303 (OP)
it does in the same way as flying a toy helicopter inside a moving car. it won’t shoot back at 80mph, it’ll just hover nigga

>>519810670
>Just asking because if there's money in keeping this secret, I want in
you are in
>Belter shill

>>519810493
Star locations are consistent with the globe model, as a simplest example the Southern Cross is visible in Australia but not in Europe
Foucault's pendulum, it's not my problem if you can't be bothered to reproduce it
Cyclones being the shape that they are (Coriolis force)
Watch a sunset, go up a cliff, watch a sunset again
Moon eclipses

>>519807303 (OP)
The spin imparted motion onto all the things on the earth, every metal and every atom, before it was even assembled into a helicopter. Good luck getting rid of the spin.

>>519810849
>Star locations are consistent with the globe model
no they aren't.
between summer and winter there's 2 AU distance between the Earth's position (allegedly) yet ZERO parallax between stars.
Entire constellations should noticeably change, i.e. big dipper's handle should get longer in the summer, Orion's belt should get wider during winter.
but it doesn't happen.
no parallax -> all the 'stars' are the same distance away.
what shape would that create?
hint: vidrel.

>>519807303 (OP)
>Has never been on any kind of aircraft before
The pilot is making tiny adjustments every second to keep the copter stable relative to the ground.

>>519810849
>Watch a sunset, go up a cliff, watch a sunset again

>>519810849
>Moon eclipses
Selenelion Eclipses are totally inconsistent with the standard model.

>>519810550
Oh FUK. How do we refute this one, bros?

>>519811093
>The pilot is making tiny adjustments every second to keep the copter stable relative to the ground.
watch time lapses of long flights trailing the sun, notice their constant need to adjust course to stay pointed at the sun

>>519807303 (OP)
Throw a ball in a car. If you have an IQ above 90, you will be able to understand how this relates to the helicopter and proves the earth is round.

>>519811070
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_parallax
You can probably measure star parallax with a hobbyist telescope nowadays.

>>519811106
Did you even try to understand my argument here?

>>519811505
I did that once, and it got stuck under the break. My dad flipped the car over and died in the ensuing crash. While it didn't prove anything about the shape of the earth, it sure did prove something about the nature of god.

>>519811158
It is consistent. Earth's shadow at distance to the moon is only around the size of 2.5 moon radii, so there a very small difference in Moon's position between a partial lunar eclipse from one end and the other.

>>519811545
>You can probably measure star parallax with a hobbyist telescope nowadays.
you can't.
which is why you don't post it.
>>519811640
>Did you even try to understand my argument here?
being able to see further from higher up works the same on both models.

>>519811944
shadow is on the wrong side of the moon dipshit.

Charles Fockaert explained all of this years ago.

>>519812036
>you can't.
Sure, I can concede that, looks like you need an actual observatory for that.
>being able to see further from higher up works the same on both models
No it fucking doesn't. As far as I can tell you're trying to tell me that in a flat Earth model the Sun goes super far away at sunset, so what fucking difference does it make if you're higher up?
>shadow is on the wrong side of the moon dipshit
I'm sorry, I expected you to follow.
When you shine a light on a thing, you can see it has a full shadow (which gets narrower the further you get) and a partial shadow. The same applies to the Sun and the Earth. At the distance the Moon is, the Earth's shadow is only around 2.5 Moons wide. So for partial eclipses on both sides of the Earth's shadow, the Moon's position is pretty similar. You can see the Moon move by 5 to 6 of its lengths on the video alone, so clearly it's possible to see the Moon being partially eclipsed from the other side of the Earth's shadow.

>>519811545
Do you realize that you're trying to debate someone with double digit IQ? That guy is just parroting some shit he copypasted from some website. Don't waste your time, every time you debate him you're making him feel even more superior for having a knowledge reserved to just a few "smart ones". What you're doing is the equivalent of jerking off a chimp. The chimp will be happy, but what do you get out of it?

>>519812603
I'm bored and want to feel smart. Why do you think people visit this board?

>>519812601
>so what fucking difference does it make if you're higher up?
you can see further due to something called 'compression distortion'.
>When you shine a light on a thing, you can see it has a full shadow (which gets narrower the further you get) and a partial shadow. The same applies to the Sun and the Earth. At the distance the Moon is, the Earth's shadow is only around 2.5 Moons wide. So for partial eclipses on both sides of the Earth's shadow, the Moon's position is pretty similar. You can see the Moon move by 5 to 6 of its lengths on the video alone, so clearly it's possible to see the Moon being partially eclipsed from the other side of the Earth's shadow.
its still on the wrong side of the moon dipshit.

>>519812603
sly why is your flag German?
you stupid fat lying sack of shit.

>>519813060
>you can see further due to something called 'compression distortion'
Explain.
>its still on the wrong side of the moon dipshit
That'd what I'm trying to explain to you, retard. The moon has to be near Earth's FULL shadow for a partial eclipse. That shadow is a cone circumscribed on the Earth and the Sun, the diameter of which gets smaller with distance. You can see the other variant because around the Moon the shadow cone is narrow enough that the Moon can be partially outside it on the other side and still be visible.

>>519813112
>picrel
Russia lost. Making fun of some literallywho won't change that.