Anonymous
(ID: Kj34U0NJ)
10/26/2025, 6:42:05 AM
No.519833892
[Report]
>>519836177
>>519836238
>>519836283
>>519836485
>>519837391
>>519837767
>>519838173
>>519838225
>>519838288
>>519838560
>>519839177
>>519840191
>>519841000
>>519841246
>>519841419
>>519841501
>>519841867
>>519841905
>>519842498
>>519842586
/pol/ has to stop this defamation campaign
Reputable Hadith scholars do not consider the narration about the Al Zutts and the Prophet to be a reliable account of actual sexual activity between the two. In fact, it's a mistranslation by the kikes. The word in the Hadith actually means “overwhelm” or “surround” and not "rode", and no trustworthy confirmation from major canonical collections, assert that the Al Zutts “rode” the Prophet.
It's an extremely weak Hadith which is poorly translated by the kike faggots to defame the Prophet.
The Zutts only surrounded the Prophet from all sides to admire his beauty and to worship and learn from him.
Contrary to kike translations, they did not "ride" him.
I'm not even a Muslim and even I understand how this is a fucking psyop aimed at emasculating the Prophet of Islam.
It's an extremely weak Hadith which is poorly translated by the kike faggots to defame the Prophet.
The Zutts only surrounded the Prophet from all sides to admire his beauty and to worship and learn from him.
Contrary to kike translations, they did not "ride" him.
I'm not even a Muslim and even I understand how this is a fucking psyop aimed at emasculating the Prophet of Islam.