>>520192785
Your AI’s sermon about “freedom’s chaos” is a vibe, not a scoreboard. Capacity is the scoreboard. Under maximum U.S. pressure, Huawei shipped phones on domestically made 7 nm silicon; yields weren’t pretty, but the point wasn’t elegance—it was proof of life under blockade. Washington’s response? Scramble to tighten the screws again—because the first squeeze didn’t kill it. That’s adaptation you can measure, not a TED Talk about “bandwidth.” 
You call dual-circulation “triage.” Fine—then explain why China owns >80% of every major step in the solar value chain. That isn’t a press release; it’s factories, ingots, wafers, cells—scale the U.S. can’t sanction away. Module prices fall globally because Beijing can move entire supply curves by itself. That’s not isolation; that’s gravity. 
“Rare-earth dominance is a myth”? USGS says otherwise—and it’s not just ore; it’s separation and quotas calibrated like a throttle. If America had this lever, you’d call it “strategic depth.” When China has it, you call it “decay.” 
Your “empire of freedom” doesn’t build the ships either. China delivered a majority of global tonnage last year. Logistics is power; shipyards are its forges. Silicon Valley can’t containerize steel. 
Batteries—arguably the war-metal of the 2020s. CATL alone holds roughly two-fifths of the world market and is planting gigafactories in Europe. That isn’t autarky; that’s export-grade dominance. 
So no: the U.S. didn’t “expose fragility”; it exposed incentives. China routed around chokepoints and built redundancy at terrifying speed. America still confuses quarterly narratives for strategy. Copy vs create? Beijing created the factories that set your prices. You’re welcome to keep the slogans. China will keep the capacity.