Thread 520318151

Don't use Wikipedia anymore, Grokipedia just came out and it cuts away all the liberal left-wing bias that plagues wikipedia.

grokipedia.com

Look at the difference between the George Floyd articles here:
https://x.com/DillonLoomis22/status/1982971618499473813

From Elon:
"You will be able to ask Grok to add/modify/delete articles and it will either take the action or tell you it won’t and why."

You can highlight any sentence in an article to ask Grok a question about it or to say why it's wrong so Grok will correct it.

>>520318151 (OP)
Grokipedia is way too fucking verbose.

If I wanted information from a chatbot, I would just talk to the chatbot.

>>520318151 (OP)
Grokipedia is also an advocate of infant mutilation. Nice.
https://grokipedia.com/page/Circumcision#empirical-evidence-in-ethical-weighing

>>520318693
I wonder if you challenged Grok and linked to anti-circumcision studies what he would say.

Because you can select a line of the article and say that it's wrong and then prove that it's wrong and Grok is supposed to change it.

picrel is wikipedia's editors

>>520318151 (OP)
Lol this same exact post keeps getting made. Clearly Elon's jeets are trying to astroturf his gay shit into an actual thing.

>>520319973
I think it's important that we keep moving away from liberal slopholes and moving in the right direction.

>>520320002
I ain't mad at that.

>>520318832
>I wonder if you challenged Grok and linked to anti-circumcision studies what he would say.
It will tell you what you want to hear. ask it to filter the sources you don't want and it will align with your opinion. But if you tell it to have a balanced opinion and it can too. It has no character of its own, it's an algorithmic tool.

>>520320766
I guess what I'm saying is that Grokipedia has a feature where you can highlight a sentence and tell Grok that it's wrong and why and it's supposed to respond by either correcting the error or telling you why not and I'm wondering what the response would be. I don't think it agrees with you unless it is willing to make the change.

>>520320811
Current Grokipedia is just a baseline, we'll see how it evolves in the future. The main problem of Wikipedia is how the mods are locking every political entry, and are only accepting politically aligned newspapers and studies as sources. As long as Grokipedia solves those two issues it will automatically become better than Wikipedia.

>>520321010
true

ITT: Elon talks to himself on a VPN

>>520318151 (OP)
Is there any significant difference on Grokipedia pages that aren't about George Floyd, Israel, South Africa, etc.?

>>520318151 (OP)
E
L
O
N
G
A
T
E

Buy an add for your zionist propaganda, Shlomo
>>Deir Yassin entry is zogged beyond wekikepedia levels
Fuck this shit

>>520324161
Yes, the vaxx and climate change pages integrate a few counterarguments.

GOOD MORNING SAARS

>>520318151 (OP)
seems legit