Thread 520322498

Dump all known info on nanomaterials in blood emitting signals

Also, MAC addresses? Legit ? (sounds like disinfo to me, i suspect you would need to look much harder to find the actual signals)

They are prob encoded in wifi, but there should be ways to pick up abbarent energy around the human brain

Also its not vaccines. They are getting the nano in via food/drinks/aresols ect

Here's what Edward Riordan remote viewed about the vax clots 2+ years before covid happened for those doubting the legitimacy of remote viewing
https://youtu.be/E930RNiCUOM

This is what he got in the remote viewing data:
>strong sensation of the thing hes viewing being manmade
>virus
>flowing through blood
>growing and expanding
>inside
>DNA
>gives off some sort of signal, communicates somehow, wifi
>cracking, busting open
>feeling of fear, concern, doesn't feel good
>transformation
>sun/solar was something he felt a lot, mentioned solar explosion (solar flare or CME?)
>sea life/aquatic
>combined technology with plant cells/matter
>study of algae blooms
>has an effect on the human body
>received signal has an effect on the body

The remote viewing findings of the clots interacting with wifi signals lines up with the findings in the video below where it was discovered that people who have been vaccinated give off bluetooth signals. The people running the tests went to a graveyard with no one else in it, and they picked up on multiple bluetooth signals which lead them to graves of people who died after 2020. So for people saying that these clots already existed prior to 2017 and the viewer made up his findings based off of that, you're incorrect as the clots you speak of didn't give off bluetooth/wifi signals like the remote viewer percieved
https://www.bitchute.com/video/g5VMGP6j60Rd/

>>520322498 (OP)
that's just stupid

>>520323237
If you are still questioning if remote viewing is real or not, heres a documentary with interviews of the people who originally developed and worked on the program with the CIA that goes into detail about the many successes they had, including a time where a remote viewer discovered a top secret spying facility that nobody knew existed except for the people running it, which got them in hot water with the government because they thought someone was leaking classified information to them. The viewer was able to correctly identify names of files in a filing cabinet that were SAP (Special Access Programs which are above Top Secret clearance that very few people know about)
https://youtu.be/-WUaS_Ynd_M
Alternate links:
https://tubitv.com/movies/573531/third-eye-spies
https://pluto.tv/en/on-demand/movies/6180bca2866a40001a7c92be/details
https://therokuchannel.roku.com/details/19c177c57ce05663a0869ed1473332a0/third-eye-spies

>>520323259
Wrong, they've had this technology for a while now
https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2001/11/liquid-computing-html

>>520323338
Here's some of Charles Liebers more recent research. Not only is he Jewish but he was also arrested for not disclosing that he was receiving money from china's thousand talents program. He held a position at the Wuhan University of Technology, which is 15 minutes away from the biolab where covid likely originated in China
https://cmlresearch.org/stage-shows/

>>520323180

Its not an aprox means of getting information tho. Its basically like divination through dreams.

The implants are very likely nano scale. The idea they need implants like in that photo smacks of disinfo

There where other posts here before with more in depth and realistic datadumps of the tech at play

The signal can be found by letting AI scan your wifi, then running deep math on the smallest abnormalities to find patterns

In this way you can find the hidden signals. Likewise scan the body/brain magnetic field, then let AI find the aberrations

Most people report tinnitus and brain static coming with new wifi modems installed in homes, and major tinnitus epidemic corresponds with covid lockdown timeframe + activation of new 5G towers

>nanomaterials
does this shit actually exists or is it just a meme like AI? i'm kinda out of the science loop

>>520322498 (OP)
>nanomaterials in blood emitting signals

Counter information.
Graphene cannot stay in the human body.
The body makes peroxide to oxide structures within the human body.
While nano materials as you put it could cause extensive damage or have ulterior motives. They could not stay in the body for very long mainly due to surface area being interacted with the peroxide.
This is why artificial material has to be replaced after a few years in the body.

By all means research this yourself.
The only reason humans get metal toxicity though is because it's accumulative via diet.
If you fast every once in a while, your body can naturally get rid of nearly everything since you aren't ingesting new material.
Brain and joints are particularly at risk though.
Both work through an osmosis sort of pumping mechanism.
The brain through the blood/brain barrier, joints through literal osmosis of nutrients through the surrounding muscle/tendon tissue (most joints have no direct blood flow).
So be aware that "nanomaterials" are most damaging to these two.

>>520324125

its not that they emit signals in the way your thinking. they transduce (convert) the brain’s electrochemical signals into photonic or em signals.or receive external em input and stimulate neurons by light (optogenetic-style) or local field effects. So, they act like micro wireless transceivers bridging biological signals and photonic/EM communication. Its not just graphene. Quantum dots, plasmonic nano (Gold) ect.

>>520324125
Graphene can stay in the body if properly modified. Peroxide can oxidize materials, but nanomaterials can be engineered to resist that. Most implants need replacement due to wear, not toxicity. Metal toxicity is mainly an accumulation issue from diet, not nanomaterials. Brain and joints are vulnerable, but targeted nanomaterials can be designed to bypass those risks.

I did a quick experiment with a couple of friends using a Bluetooth scanner. I tested myself (unvaxxed) in an elevator shaft. No other electronic devices on me as it is true some devices will emit an unknown MAC address with no brand ID or identifiers for proximity tracking, tags etc. By myself there was nada. Tested this a few times on different occasions. Zero network reception. I always thought this theory was whacko when I first heard about it just like the magnetic spoons sticking etc. The video showcasing this was filmed outdoors and didn't exactly appear credible.

Next I tried this out with one friend (without their knowledge) and had two unknown MAC addresses appear. Now I was intrigued and informed him. Got the expected doubtful response and retried when he left his phone, car keys and anything powered behind and one of the same addresses reappeared. That address is always discoverable when he is in proximity. Friend number two, same result different MAC address. This was 6 months ago. Neither gave a flying fuck.

Easily replicated for anyone here. For reference both were 3 Pfizer shots deep. Same does not apply for AZ.

>>520324887

Im highly skeptical (and thats putting it mildly) that they would make it that easy to find the signal

Sounds like a diversionary psyop.

I strongly suspect mil grade signal analysis is needed (as its what i did to find one hidden signal emanating through my wifi)

Id give what your saying a go, but id be almost certain what your talking about is signals from various electronic devices. Your prob in an urban area

>>520325203
An elevator is the only escape you can have here in the city. A giant concrete faraday cage is the closest obtainable location to test. I do agree its not a comprehensive test and I am the only control available in this scenario. There were no devices in the vicinity. Far from having expertise on any of this other than an observation which produced a replicated result.

If in fact there is any truth to this I would love to know what can be done with a bio emitted bluetooth signal. Is it read-only for tracking purposes/identification or can it possibly be used for something more sinister?
As for being out in the open? It blends in with a million smart devices and is easily disputed. Having a network of disguised readers is the hard part.

>>520325819

It requires sensitive equipt and some very advanced techniques to detect.

Your propogating a psyop they put out to misdirect people

because it can actually be found through advanced sig analysis, MEG of brain ect.