Thread 520356310

LECTURER “ADULT GROOMS” GIRL AT UNIVERSITY
this poor girl luzie was only 20 years old and on the cusp of adulthood when a lecturer breached academic codes and entered a relationship with her - a clear power imbalance and super problematic. when are we going to pass adult grooming laws so that vulnerable young women (20 is practically a child) are protected from older men?

https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360872331/he-said-he-believed-me-student-calls-relationship-lecturer-adult-grooming

>>520356310 (OP)
Bump

HE IS BEGINNING TO BELIEVE

Lmao insane take

>>520356310 (OP)
When I worked for a university it was in documents that I signed when I got hired that said I agreed to not date or be sexual with any of the students. No relationships with students. It was a fireable offense

>>520356310 (OP)
>adult grooming
Society is pussy whipped if this is what people will believe lol

SHE'S TWO YEARS ABOVE THE AGE OF CONSENT YOU SICK FUCK

>>520356310 (OP)

theres a limit to insanity, fortunately.

i've been adult-grooming some hoes lately i'll let you guys know if it works out

>>520356550
This is the angle the article should’ve taken, because *that* is the main issue, not this “adult grooming” nonsense

boomer women who happily fucked their professors in the name of women's liberation and slept with rock stars are strangely silent now

>>520356550
I do think that's fair, and it has nothing to do with age. If a man in his 60s can still pull women in their early 20s, more power to him I say, but a professor should not be involved with students. Massive conflict of interest.

Then again, women really shouldn't be involved with higher education in general, but that's a different topic.

...

back in my day, hot & intelligent teachers would do nothing more than 'accidentally' drop a pencil.
this guy is a sleezeball. how about making education your life goal, not pussy

>>520356310 (OP)
women like this should have one of their tits amputated as a warning to men and as a mark of shame.
so long as we're chopping up kids, fuck it.

>>520356550
>>520356776
This shit is so dumb because why else is a man going to get into a position of power? There's no point if u can't get young poon.

>>520356550
cuck'd

>>520356310 (OP)
White people are going to ban sex between humans they’re going to introduce age gap laws next

>>520356547
>all heterosexual sex is rape because men are stronger than women and so the woman cannot truly consent

>>520356550
I’m at a university now. Our policy and most policies is that you can’t have a relationship with any students you teach or have academic oversight of in any way. If they’re just a student but you have no personal educator-student relationship with them it’s fine. Students not in your classes but in your department’s classes are a grey area because in theory you can be influencing their teachers. Still, I’ve dated students and never had a problem.

Islam is right about everything.

>>520356924
School is somewhat unique because the whole point is to further a student’s education and at an institution a relationship with them gets in the way of that. At corporations and other places where women can benefit career-wise it’s different.

As a professional educator I have to agree that having a relationship with a student of yours is wrong. It’s not rape, or grooming. But it is wrong.

>>520356673
I assume its similar at other universities/colleges
>>520356776
Its a reasonable policy. I wasnt bothered by it.

>>520356924
I took the job because the pay was alright and good benefits and needed the money

>>520356950
Its not unreasonable for a company to ask its employees to not fuck the customers

>>520356815
(((Schmid)))

>>520356310 (OP)

>he said he believed in me
and she was dumb enough to not know this is guy code for "I want to fuck you"

What a hapless generation of women, is it any wonder that despite millions of years of evolution, the only self-defense mechanism that women have developed is. "sorry I have a boyfriend"

>>520356310 (OP)
>>520356547
Women will agree with this while men will think it's insane, because women conform to expectations ahead of being told what those expectations are and men do not.

If you want to force compliance out of a man, you threaten him explicitly; do X or I'll do Y to you. But with a woman, all that's necessary is the perception of you having higher social status and the feeling that you might not like her as much if she doesn't do what you want. Then she'll truly feel, in her heart of hearts, that she MUST do whatever is suggested. This is true even if she never gets a direct indication from you and is just guessing at what you want.

This is why "no means no" is insane; women do not feel permission to say no in the circumstances where they need to and just let men rape them rather than risk a mild confrontation. Such people can only be protected by supervision from authority figures who can say no.

Women do not risk confrontations with superior male figures so if it's asked for they will grant it. Men can't read minds so we can't be expected to know she didn't actually mean it, but we are expected to act on verbal confirmations which are withdrawn later.

>>520356310 (OP)
Women are still ridiculous man. They expect to be seen as strong and independent, yet apparently can't handle adult relationships.

>>520356776
>>520356924
>>520357199
Women used to fuck their professors all the time in the 60s/70s and quite often these relationships led to happy marriages with children. Women want men who are superior to them. To disallow power imbalances is to disallow most organic attraction between men and women.

>>520356310 (OP)
Until when are women going to victimise themselves after 18 years old?

>>520356776
Dumb. Women are weaker by nature so there will always be a "power imbalance."

>If you date a 35 year old roastie, you're grooming her!
>She needs to be at least 55 years old!