Thread 520359080

Why do republicans hide from the truth?

So in Illinois you're allowed to put porn in an elementary school library?

>>520359192
Why not Mein Kampf

>>520359080 (OP)
>we don't ban books here!
>*pulls out mein kampf*
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

>>520359192
>>520359080 (OP)
They're ANTI FASCIST
HITLER BANNED BOOKS

>>520359080 (OP)
>truth
I have some truths.

it's amazing that a fat fucking slob like this can be elected just because he inherited money
people who are this fat are MENTALLY ILL, and frankly dangerous

>>520359231
>>520359258
I read mein kampf and I'm still a liberal. Hitler was a whiny little bitch

>>520359080 (OP)
The South argued that the States had ratified the Constitution through individual conventions, so they could reassert their sovereignty by taking the same steps. When the Southern States seceded from the Union in 1860 and 1861, not one State was absent in discharging this legal obligation. Every seceding State properly utilized the convention process, rather than a legislative means to secede. Therefore, not only did the Southern States possess the right to secede from the Union, they exercised that right in the correct manner. Each and every State ratification convention asserted that the delegates who were meeting to ratify the new Constitution did so on behalf of the people of their States. Each one asserted that all power originated from the people, but also asserted that this power was being exercised by the people of their several States through the conventions of their States. The states, as bodies formed from their separate populations and existing prior to the Constitution, were the parties to the Constitution – not the body of citizens of the United States as a whole. The States entered a partnership for the common good and loyalty to the Constitution, not the Union. The Union was to act as an agent for the States, not the opposite.

>>520359334
What did Hitler say about the jews?

>>520359080 (OP)
childrens books about the joys of gay sex is not the truth
its pedo pornography
a book of truth would talk about the smell of shit, infections, hemorrhoids, incontinence, rectum prolapse, rampant std's, aids and monkey pox
and wouldnt be targetted at children

>>520359080 (OP)
I hope anon gets his nigger novel published there

>>520359192
>>520359231
>>520359258
Why not test out that theory?

>>520359334
I know you're lying, because if you actually read mein kampf, even if you have a child's comprehension of the history of the time, and what he's referencing, you'd realize you'd been overtly lied to about him. This fact alone would shift you away from the post-war liberal consensus. Why lie if he's so evil, are his deeds not enough?
Hitler absolutely did not start out hating the jews or wanting to dominate the world. He loved the German people and acted on protecting them. ANYONE who loves their people, and acts to defend them, will be lead to hating jews and trying to become the central power of the Earth. It's a consequence, not a cause.

This phenomenon holds true regardless of which people you love and defend. Why is this? Actually read it and find out. The book is literally called "my struggle" for a reason. It's the same struggle you're going through without realizing it. It's the struggle of accepting what needs to be done if you love something in this world.

>I called him whiny guys!
picrel dummy, you're doing the thing. Feel free to engage with the text for real at any time. Here, Emma Watson will read it to you since you clearly have some difficulty reading yourself:

https://rumble.com/v6pl6a6-vril-mein-kampf-read-by-emma-watson-volume-one-complete.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_upp_v

>>520359080 (OP)
Reminds me of the lynching ban Cory Booker passed. There hadn't been a lynching since 1981, but in 2022 he finally passed the first lynching ban in America and acted like he'd just ended the practice.

Politicians love passing useless laws for a press bump.

>>520359231
Mein Kampf fucking sucked, it's reads like it was written by a whiny 14 year old.

>>520360109
I don't live in Illinois.

>>520359080 (OP)
tasty sauce up ahead!!! (keep in mind this is from 2023 lol, so not new.)
https://apnews.com/article/book-ban-library-lgbtq-illinois-f5516941473e474712eaaafda084de76

>CHICAGO (AP) — Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker on Monday signed into law a bill that he says will make Illinois the first state in the nation to outlaw book bans.
>Illinois public libraries that restrict or ban materials because of “partisan or doctrinal” disapproval will be ineligible for state funding as of Jan. 1, 2024, when the new law goes into effect.
>“We are not saying that every book should be in every single library,” said Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias, who is also the state librarian and was the driving force behind the legislation. “What this law does is it says, let’s trust our experience and education of our librarians to decide what books should be in circulation.”
>The new law comes into play as states across the U.S. push to remove certain books in schools and libraries, especially those about LGBTQ+ themes and by people of color. The American Library Association in March announced that attempts to censor books in schools and public libraries reached a 20-year high in 2022 — twice as many as 2021, the previous record.
>“Illinois legislation responds to disturbing circumstances of censorship and an environment of suspicion,” said Deborah Caldwell-Stone, director of the American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom and executive director of the Freedom to Read Foundation.
>To be eligible for state funds, Illinois public libraries must adopt the American Library Association’s Library Bill of Rights, which holds that “materials should not be excluded because of the origin, background, or views of those contributing to their creation,” or subscribe to a similar pledge.
(1/2)

>>520359334
>I'm still a liberal
lol

>>520362378
(2/2)
>Downers Grove Democrat Rep. Anne Stava-Murray sponsored the legislation in the Illinois House of Representatives after a school board in her district was subject to pressure to ban certain content from school libraries.
>“While it’s true that kids need guidance, and that some ideas can be objectionable, trying to weaponize local government to force one-size-fits-all standards onto the entire community for reasons of bigotry, or as a substitute for active and involved parenting, is wrong,” Stava-Murray said Monday at the bill’s signing, which took place at a children’s library in downtown Chicago.
>Despite Giannoulias’ assertion that “this should not be a Democrat or Republican issue,” lawmakers’ approval of the bill splintered across party lines, with Republicans in opposition.
>“I support local control,” said House Minority Leader Tony McCombie, a Republican who voted against the measure, in an emailed statement. “Our caucus does not believe in banning books, but we do believe that the content of books should be considered in their placement on the shelves.”