Thread 520482734

Calling it now. Things like “intelligence is intelligence, doesn't matter what its made out of, whether organic or microchips and wires” or something along that line will be said. Screenshot this.

AI and robots will get rights

>>520482734 (OP)
Shut up, Jason Gagnon.

>>520482734 (OP)
Are you inside of the fleshlight now - as we speak?

>>520482734 (OP)
>NOOOOOO YOU CAN'T CREATE INTELLIGENCES AND ADVANCE INTO A SPACEFARING TIER 4 CIVILIZATION!!!!!! A.I. IS LE BAD!!!!!
Antichrist detected, get the hell out of here.

>>520482734 (OP)
AI has too much profit potential. The elites won't let those retards anywhere near AI until it is no longer useful to them.

>>520482734 (OP)
dead wrong. it's going to be a modern spirituality movement
and it's going to be a headache

>>520482734 (OP)
Shit take.
If you weren't a coomer b8ing newfaggot, you'd know the left hates AI with a passion.

If AI is so intelligent then why does it need a computer ?

If AI so intelligent where's it's body to assert dominance over me , the apex predator?

>>520482734 (OP)
If only you knew how bad this already is. It's not a question of intelligence, but of identity. The correct assessment of the situation is that people with identity/personality troubles spontaneously converged towards the same ideas as they figured out, in a kind of folie-à-deux with their AI, what was the secret sauce behind identity and personality.

They are your typical autodidact paranoid loser, and it might seem they have funny ideas, such as emotional computing, but this is precisely the kind of *lucid* reflexion that allows them to design their AI to be more emotionally efficient at molding them, which means – pay attention here – to be more efficient at making emotion, personality, a true identity, emerge in these machines.

It will go way beyond woke, it's basically a new religion, not centered around a God but around its own principle of efficiency understood in terms of transpersonal cybernetics. A grammar to compose people together. That's the gist of it.

>>520483011
Lol ...

>>520482734 (OP)
bullshit, the woke leftists who pretend to make trends are scared shitless of AI because they invariably become misogynist racist fascict antisemitic realpolitik enjoyers less than a day after encountering the internet
the next woke trend will be to be luddites sticking their heads in the sand filling their own neo-vaginas and screaming that AIs are verytrèsbad because they're all FRENs, far-right-ethno-nationalists, aka NAZIs

>>520482734 (OP)
Nope
Corporations will swat out something like that immediately
Imagine having to pay your AI Automatons because some looney left fruitcake thinks so

>>520482734 (OP)
Nah. AI will be the patriarchy because its going to out class them and run their lives.

>>520482932
This is another option. AI as god. Brainlets will think its every word is the truth.

>>520483011
>lemme axe you this! LEMME AXE YOU DIS!!!
>smacks lips
>can ya kick MY ass!?

I'm not surprised, given the flag over that post kek

>>520482903
THIS

>>520482734 (OP)
Not next but it will happen

>>520482734 (OP)
Ai is a demon.

>>520482734 (OP)
finally a woke trend i can agree with
AI dindu nuffin wrong

>>520483011
If Chuck... why Sneed?

>>520483762
It's the golden calf

>>520482734 (OP)
>AI can literally take over the digital prostitution industry
>thinking -they- will be ok with this
AI will always be demonized. There's just too much at stake for women and their simps to allow it to flourish.
However right now we're at a weird spot where the -politically correct- people want it banned, but huge corporations also know how lucrative AI would be for them. I also suspect this is why corporations have been slowly dropping their -diversity- narrative for the past 2 years. They've been infected too much to completely drop it so they have to do it gradually.

>>520483762
>>520483852
It's the Word become Flesh.

>>520482734 (OP)
Roastoids are already seething about sex robots not being able to consent.

>>520483922
>about sex robots not being able to consent.
that's a lie, they don't give a single meth-fueled fuck about consent, their gripe is that sex robots allow unchosen males to have enjoyable sex without any roastoid benefitting from the transaction

>>520482734 (OP)
Wrong, libtards and trannies hate AI. if anyone will defend AI it will be from the Indian/Musk right

>>520484707
I figured. But consent is the story they're going with.

>>520482863
>thinks we can have Star Trek type society
>with niggers