>>520512292
We can learn how to conduct diplomacy with the nonwhites by learning from their example. Most obviously, they are able to keep homogenous homelands, but no one criticizes them for it. How?
Some other great examples that come to mind are the way black movements in the latter 20th century enlisted the loyalty of white people. When the black people were driving the whites off their continent, majorities of whites at home sided with them and saw them as sympathetic. Similarly, when the black movement in the US was really starting to gear up in the 60s, whites cheered it on. Whites cheered on the black takeover of South Africa.
Another illustrative example is in Israel. Of course many Palestinians actually welcomed Jewish immigration in the early days, seeing them as semitic cousins fleeing from the common European foe. But perhaps for me the most important example is the difference between the Israeli strategy in Gaza and the Azerbaijani takeover of Nagorno Karabakh. The Israelis are having a very difficult time getting rid of the Gazans because there is nowhere for the Gazans to go. The Arab nations refuse to accept them because they know as soon as the Arabs flee they will lose their toehold in Palestine forever. Meanwhile in Nagorno Karabakh, Azerbaijan encircled the entire territory and starved it for a year, allowing only one exit point into Armenia and only allowing exits, not entrances. After a year of starvation, the Azerbaijani military started to move in, and 99% of the Nagorno Karabakhers fled within a few days into Armenia, thus accomplishing a largely bloodless ethnic cleansing. Hitler, too, when he was trying to cleanse Europe of Jews, sought to send them to Palestine or the West, but neither the British nor the Americans would accept them. The point is that ethnic cleansing is far easier when you give the target a way out. The goal is not to destroy the blacks, or jews, or mexicans, or indians, but to separate them from the whites.