>>520541657 (OP)
How could he shit him?
Did he eat him?
Why wouldn't they lead with that?
That's way more interesting.
I guess they just believe in the intelligence of their reader?
That's refreshing I suppose. I appreciate it. Maybe they didn't want to put cannibalistic images in our heads?
Or was it just a typo and they meant shit on him?
I'm gonna feel real silly if that's the case.