>>520564923
He is saying the left won you illiterate homunculus. Historically when one political side murders a high profile figure of the opposite side and there is NO public push back or outrage then the side who commits the murder will win an autocratic takeover of the country. This is the way in all totalitarian take overs.
In Nazi Germany in the 1920s the Nazis murdered Foriegn Minister Walther Rathanau and there was zero pushback from the people, in fact the newspapers jeered and derided Rathanau.
In fascist Italy, the fascist take over was solidified with the murder of left wing journalist Matteo Giancuomo. In fact Mussolini’s government was thrown into chaos from the scandal and was almost toppled but they weathered the pushback and consolidated power.
Then there was Republican Rome. The senate made a bid for power by murdering Julius Caesar. The pushback was instantaneous and immediate. The entire capital erupted in a multi day city wide riot which ended with the burning down of the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus which was used as a funeral pyre of the Roman leader. The perpetrators were hunted down, proscribed and 2000 years later are remembered as history’s greatest turncoats to the same level as Judeas and Arnold, Benedict.
In time colleges and Universities will ban all political speakers and use the murder of Charlie Kirk as the justification to stop all further speech and debate.
Assuming the president will do nothing (he is all bluster anyway) it will mean the end of free elections. It meant that in Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. We have seen it countless times in other autocratic take overs and we are seeing it now. So my guess is Kirk will get a paragraph or 2 in the history books more than a footnote.
