Anonymous
(ID: KdBLpXcG)
11/5/2025, 8:40:31 PM
No.520685051
[Report]
>>520685176
>>520685371
>>520685547
>>520685678
>>520685830
>>520685927
>>520686813
>>520687105
>>520688342
>>520688663
>>520688780
>>520688946
>>520688998
>>520689395
>>520689615
SCOTUS TO RULE ON CONSTITUTIONAL MERITS OF TRUMP EO ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/25-365/378052/20250926163053178_TrumpvBarbaraCertPet.pdf
THEY WILL MAKE THEIR RULING ON OR BEFORE JUNE OF 2026.
THIS WILL RETROACTIVELY ERASE CITIZENSHIP STATUS FOR ALL THOSE IN THE US BORN TO ILLEGALS OR TEMPORARY VISA HOLDERS GOING BACK TO 1860S WHEN THE 14TH WAS RATIFIED!
>Why would it be retroactive?
The Constitution supersedes EVERYTHING
POTUS cannot make EO's that are explicitly unconstitutional
Congress cannot make laws that are explicitly unconstitutional
When SCOTUS makes rulings ON the Constitution itself in their majority opinions on constitutional questions and interpretations those rulings are by DEFINITION, RETROACTIVE because to argue otherwise would be to claim that SCOTUS has the AUTHORITY or POWER to alter or amend the US Constitution which of course they don't.
That power solely rests with Article V of the US Constitution, here I will quote it for you;
>The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
SCOTUS CANNOT AMEND THE CONSTITUTION THUS THEIR RULINGS ARE SEEN AS WHAT THE CONSTITUTION HAS ALWAYS MEANT/ALWAYS WAS.
THEY WILL MAKE THEIR RULING ON OR BEFORE JUNE OF 2026.
THIS WILL RETROACTIVELY ERASE CITIZENSHIP STATUS FOR ALL THOSE IN THE US BORN TO ILLEGALS OR TEMPORARY VISA HOLDERS GOING BACK TO 1860S WHEN THE 14TH WAS RATIFIED!
>Why would it be retroactive?
The Constitution supersedes EVERYTHING
POTUS cannot make EO's that are explicitly unconstitutional
Congress cannot make laws that are explicitly unconstitutional
When SCOTUS makes rulings ON the Constitution itself in their majority opinions on constitutional questions and interpretations those rulings are by DEFINITION, RETROACTIVE because to argue otherwise would be to claim that SCOTUS has the AUTHORITY or POWER to alter or amend the US Constitution which of course they don't.
That power solely rests with Article V of the US Constitution, here I will quote it for you;
>The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
SCOTUS CANNOT AMEND THE CONSTITUTION THUS THEIR RULINGS ARE SEEN AS WHAT THE CONSTITUTION HAS ALWAYS MEANT/ALWAYS WAS.