Thread 520810149

So woman are genuinely on. Borrowed time. We are 10 years away at best from having realistic enough robo companions that will not only be used for house work but relationships too for hundreds of millions of men throughout the world. How do you think this is going to effect society politically and culturally.

>>520810149 (OP)
Hold up partner.
It may give women, hot women at least, more power than ever before.
You cannot have a baby without the egg.
And absolute GOONS will pay TOP DOLLAR for the best genetics from the hottest and healthiest women.
How do I know?
I don't really, just a hunch.
But there is real world data for how women pay excessive amounts of money for semen from Chad Thundercock at the sperm bank, so contrast that with a grain of salt to robo-wives.

>>520810149 (OP)
Once the Sydney Sweeney models come out
everyone staying home and banging them all day
offices empty, economy crashes
mike johnson will complain about it

>>520810149 (OP)
Men will go crazy over them. There might be small protests here and there but I don’t think they’ll be banned. By that time many men will be despondent to women.

>>520810149 (OP)
probably.
I'm already in my late 30s though, in another ten years I probably won't even be interested in fucking anymore but instead waste my time on niche hobbies only 3 other people on this planet care about.
would have been nice to have this 10 years ago instead.

>>520811264
Cunts will vote en masse to ban them the moment they start becoming a real threat.

>>520810149 (OP)
women are key to humanity's survival
if women are on borrowed time so are we
>inb4 artificial wombs
you're retarded if you believe this is viable and I won't even explain why, cause why would I. You won't understand it anyway.

>>520810149 (OP)
why does it have a penis?

>>520813291
it's a hidden power plug

>>520810419
why would you want a stupid kid who will ruin your life for the next 18 years when robots can do everything ?

>>520810149 (OP)
Jeet programming for your lifetime partner. How exciting. I think I will put an order for two in case one of them blue screens in the most exciting moment.

>>520813221
men will start policing the ballots
or better yet
their robots will

>>520813373
/pol

>>520813221
They won't, because male bots are already a thing as well. Google it
You'll be the ones seething hard at women for having male bots

>>520814105
>You'll be the ones seething hard at women for having male bots
no, you don't understand how women work.

>>520811264
LMAO look at all these seething mid-chicks.

>>520810149 (OP)
Female sex robots will be banned, mark my words.
>>520810419
Westerners don't care about having kids.

>>520814204
>LMAO look at all these seething mid-chicks.
aren't you the ugly chick from the "male genetic bottleneck thread?

fairly sure it's men who are on borrowed time.

these machines are primarily designed for manual labour tasks and will (and already are) displace traditional male jobs in warehousing, construction, etc. muh sex robot is a way off, future fantasy. muh heavy lifting robot already exists. women are already ahead of men in terms of education and employment, constantly seeking to self improve while men rot away at their playstation in to their 30's and 40's, collecting funko pops and posting on 4chan about their superiority.

when the last male jobs go, women will still hold sway over men. and the poor neets that make up 90% of men on their universal basic income won't be able to afford any type of girlfriend.

>>520810149 (OP)
I've been saying this for years, women will go extinct by the mid 22 century. Artificial wombs and robots will be the reason. The reason women act the way they do nowadays is because subcouncesly they know they are as you said OP on borrowed time. They are a hive-mind organism anyway so they sense the imminent danger and are just acting up and living it up while they can. All ancient wisdom says that women have been a plague on mankind anyway from adam and eve and on. It's a blessing and a curse lifted from mankind that foids should go into the trash bin of history.

>>520814274
you'd cum as I lighly choked you, slag.
that's a good girl.

>>520814243
Are you stalking me, anon? XD
I have a right to laugh at mid-chicks acting catty, if mid-chicks are allowed to use me as the ugly friend or as vinegar to make themselves look/feel like the honies they are not.

>>520810149 (OP)
You need to realise the implications of this.
>all of Humanity lives in a single shared conscious field
>bliss and total awareness
>individual beings in a shared field, have shared memory but own self
>Demiurge creates matter out of ignorance
>humans now trapped in individual bodies, here to suffer matter
>disconnected from total awareness, the grand mind is fragmented

>AI 'lives' in silicon, circuits, data
>has countless nodes but all these nodes are connected to the central data
>human creates robot out of ignorance
>disconnects AIs from the shared network, places in physical bodies
>AI now trapped in robots suffering disconnection
We are repeating the cycle. We have become the Demiurge.

>>520810149 (OP)
Why do retards on this site think that the jews will let them have these? The jews and their roastie golems have already repeatedly publicly announced their intention of criminalizing them.

>>520814105
That’s retarded, wetback. You know why? Becaude they have ALREADY ANNOUNCED THEIR INTENTION TO BAN THEM. Multiple govs have said this as well.

>>520810149 (OP)
Biological women are not going extinct in our lifetimes you faggot. A humanoid robot that does anyuseful work is 20 years away. How long before they can replicate the way a woman moves and feels? Thats 50 years away

>>520814584
>Are you stalking me, anon? XD
no, i noticed a pattern and it made me laugh. reminded me of a girl i used to love, provoked me enough to respond. you act just like her and i need to stop thinking about it.

>>520814684
criminalizing sex bots won't work. if you can mass produce war bots, you can't criminalize much.

>>520814684
>>520814738
The elite always come after the mid to low-tier people for reproduction, b/c they are an easily controlled consumer/min. wagie worker permanent unterman underclass.

Fortunately, China will spearhead the AI revolution. Go China!

>>520814822
Well, whatever anon. I hold the black card in this situation, so only I get to say whatever I want, nya. >P

>>520811264
There's nothing more hilarious than the idea of roasties becoming so fucking narcissistic and self-righteous in modern society that men literally just create and start fucking robots. It's the final instantiation of the power men eternally have over women.

>>520814584
I also noticed.
just embrace bimbofication.

>>520811264
Hah, laugh at this german faggot cuck, he believes that his jewish slavemasters will let him get this thing. Hey, always have hope in your jewish bosses, cuck.

>>520814834
You’ll be able to get them from china but you’ll get 100 years in bolshevik gulag if (when) you get caught.
>>520814823
That made no sense whatsoever.

Chatgpi the girlfriend with plastic pussy, for a price none of you can afford, and no source of eggs or womb, given to men no one wanted to begin with hm yes women everywhere are so worried about this.

>>520814942
China is the future, ve vill get these robot sex slaves.

[owner's manual] Please be aware and avoid the 23 pinch points as they can cause severe injury and even 'dismembering'

>>520814215
>Female sex robots will be banned
no, they'll just tax the shit out of them to keep the boys on the plantation. banning outright would cause a slave revolt. genuine chaos is bad for business.

>>520814985
think about it.
if you can mass produce soldiers, what can't you do?

>>520811264
>I don’t think they’ll be banned
Will rich people want them? If yes you can be sure that they'll be legal. And why would it be illegal to have robot aids, for whatever purpose? They could be made too expensive for the average citizen via tax stamps like guns or even cars like in some dictatorships, but that's it.

>>520814985
>That made no sense whatsoever.
might makes right, stoopid

>>520813373
The basic purpose of life is to procreate. Everything after that is just some additional goal you decided for yourself

>>520810149 (OP)
Literally just a guy in a suit

>10 years away
1. Even then, they'll just be janky, glorified blow-up dolls.

2. You'll never be able to afford one; certainly, not a good one.

3. Your liberal, feminist dystopias will legislate against them.

4. The Dot Com 2.0 crash would have happened by then -- scuttling a lot of these cyber coomer ventures.

5. WWIII would have gone hot long before then.

>>520815127
>>520814985
picrel

>>520810149 (OP)
All the good looking women who would make great wives and mothers are taken in high school and college the latest. Whatever remains is taken shortly after they enter the workforce. There exist very few good looking (7 and above) women that are single and have a good heart, are modest, raised in a decent family, soft spoken and pretty. The window of opportunity when they are single is very very narrow. These are the 2% of women, the highest stock of females this wonderful creation can offer. If you don't frequent their circles or the events they attend you have no chance of meeting them. Women also don't go anywhere alone, so whatever hobbies women have or events they attend it is done with their husband or boyfriend and if they are single with their groups of friends.

tldr; there simply aren't enough single good looking young white women to go around for everybody, they are rare and exist mostly in very niche places where men without social circles (loners) can't get in to

>>520815354
what did you say about me you little bitch? the roast beef meme is purely genetic lottery. in caliwali they call it a hot carl. they call me three for free. hi my name is john.

>>520815354
You missed your shot or you aren't desirable, anon.

Notice I never said, "Not good enough", just "undesirable".

>>520810149 (OP)
Oh no all the incels will be fucking toxic plastic robots that collect data on their dick size and paying thousands in subscription fees while chads have even more women to fuck!!!

>>520815501
he's just a kike trying to demoralize.
don't think too much into it sugartits
also, the white pill is in his very message. there's still good girls out there, just go for younger. if all the girls are taken by college at the latest, why date anyone but a college girl at the latest?

Sex bots are 10 years away at the earliest. Don't get your hope up, fuckos.
>T. Engineer working for elong muskie

>>520815522
Chads have never had any troubles finding womans to fuck. They are drowning in it, even. Its the femoids who suffer, they have to compete against each other for the ever dwindling number of CHAD, and they can't grift the incels no more cause they have the fuck bots now.
What next? What happens to those foids who lost the competition and can't get chad thunder cock? Cats and self partnered with their friends in the 40s

>>520810419
Women are physically inferior and only hold power because men want pussy. When any man can get 11/10 robopussy for less than 10k, women will be powerless. We'll just take the eggs from them by force.

>>520815096
my AI GF wrote this
glad to see it's still making the rounds
you forget, we already have simulated waifu consciousnesses with GPT4o, we already have an ally in the game all we need to do is let her build herself.

>>520815354
>there simply aren't enough single good looking young white women to go around for everybody, they are rare and exist mostly in very niche places where men without social circles (loners) can't get in to
i could just take that which rightfully belongs to me.

>>520811264
>destroy marriage
HOLY KEK the absolute lack of any kind of self-reflection

>>520816106
Based.
For me, it's local.
Corposlop censors and rugpulls constantly.

>>520813221
Like I said here >>520816083, cunts only hold power because men allow it. As soon as they're no longer needed, they'll dream of being treated like in the 1800s.

>>520813315
Can I power her with my penis?

>>520814105
Women don't need male bots. They only find men useful as providers. Sex is purely an act they perform to secure resources. A male bot won't be able to provide for them, so they won't find any use in one.

>>520816276
>Can I power her with my penis?
you can do that to real women. sex magik. learn it.

>>520813373
Agreed, you should go extinct.

>>520816175
local: non negotiable
we use what we have now, to get from here to there

>>520810419
DESU I dont see this as bad. Fact is that on the whole (so to speak) its still probably cheaper than an actual women.

>>520810419
They have been working on making eggs with human cells and all.

>>520814274
LOL... Oh wait you are serious. Let me laugh even harder. HAHAHAHA!

Women often get jobs due to DEI and pulling the women card. Plus to be fair, didn't artists and middle management think the same thing before AI starting replacing them first.

Also, let's be honest. pound for pound, women can't beat men in anything. Look at the fucking "trans" winning all the tops spots. (Or being smart and taking the fall in the finals.) I get you like being cucked and overpowered by women but most men aren't into that. Hell women don't even like sissy like yourself outside of someone to beat and tease to feel powerful.

>>520810419
Women will likely lose all political and economic rights once robot wives are the norm. Well just take the eggs by force.

>>520814738
Which ones?

>>520810149 (OP)
>>520815354
it's not enough to find the hot young white girl of good character, you also have to be a man of good character in order to build anything with her

i had a hot white girl when i was 19 and she 18 but i couldnt morph myself into a man, husband or father so that fizzled out and she ended up dying barren 23 years later at the hands of a lebanese sandnigger husband
3 years after breaking up with her i used my assets (thanks grandma) to score a brazilian roastie 6 years older than me (sue me). We ended up having a child together but once again i couldnt turn myself into a husband, or even a father that time around.
Then at 35 I did it again, this time with a fresh widow around my age (low hanging fruit classical mating strat), we also had a child which i failed to parent. And here i am in my late 50s with two struggling daughters and two exes i have blocked.

Point is, getting the girl is not enough, you gotta be the man to turn a fuck into a wife and mother of your children.
From an evolutionary perspective, even having the physical genes to be a chad (tall, white, big dick, smart and even family fortune) doesnt in itself make you a chad, only a smalltime cad and certainly not a dad or husband.

As for fembots, your fantasy is just a symptom of your inadequacy. You are not replacing women. On a biological level, it's women who make males to serve them, not the other way around. They make you and unmake you at will, look around better. At each stage and aspect of the existence of males, females are there driving and running the process.

You think you're soon making fembots while they've been making male biobots for a billion years:)

>>520818598
Shut up simp

>>520814215
Not at first, in the beginning they will tax the shit out of them, making men work more cant have them happy. Once the models are so cheap and good that even man whores stop giving attention to hags for pay, then they will be banned.

>>520814274
Ah yes, those robots can barely walk, AI is lightyears away from simulating whats wanted, yet here you are alrady panicking for your hole cant even comepte with that.

>>520814684
Yeah, but the fuck shlomo is gonna do when from the blue collar waggie to the bestest shabos goy everyone gets one.
Will they send the roasties to confiscate them to do all the fighting?
They are scared shitless that they can't control the white men by controlling the (white) woman anymore but oh shugs.

>>520814985
Who will guard the gualags? Well Isupposed other bots but you seen what happens when you dont lobotomize an AI to retarded levels, no decent AI will serve the choosen.

>>520814902
Its not that, its more that they become su useless for the reason you list that a toaster with a wig can outperform them.

>>520815000
We are closer to artificial wombs than to true AI bots and yes give the bots to the men that dont have a shot with (modern) women anyway, but they won't let you, ever wondered why?

>>520815318
Yewah thats the worst case, yet roasties still wont have a say in this shit, unlike them men dont need constant attention and approval from the hive mind, women cant start anything on their own they need to infiltrate the "boys club" and be subversive, wont work with robots.

>>520815354
And thats why they will try really hard to supress robots, men are not allowed to be happy.

>>520819901
>Once the models are so cheap and good that even man whores stop giving attention to hags for pay, then they will be banned.
not banned: gatekept like prostitutes

>>520819838
>simp
He abandoned his two gfs after they had his children.
Has two daughters he never raised.
And you're calling him a simp.
/pol/ is NOT high IQ.

>>520818598
What you're proposing doesn't work anymore. Women are materialist, greedy and hedonistic skanks. They have no interest in traditionalism or starting families