>>520861528 (OP)
It's almost like people with more needs feel one side advocates for them better.
If you ran an accessibility campaign for your primary issue, you'd almost certain have non able people disproportionately supporting you. Especially if the other side had clear contempt for "undesirables". Maybe the message should be that the right ought to be more supportive. Instead of selecting people that handle high stress jobs with harassing bosses, maybe also support worker treatment standards.
Just like with accessibility, there's actually benefits for everyone. A ramp isn't just for a few disabled people. Any time you have heavy bags or need a dolly, you're also temporarily disables. Same as why we moved to levers instead of knobs, you can open doors when you don't have a hand, but you can also open doors if your hands are full.
Accessibility standards have benefits for everyone and help the least capable be more self sufficient, which is good because it reduces the burden on able bodied caretakers, as well as improves their mental health and contribution levels to society. Making life easier for people with depression or other mental health issues actually helps them be more productive too. Appealing to the strict neocons, this should translate to improved work hours, employment, and worker productivity, and thus improve the GDP.
What are things they actually ask for? Mental health days at work. Like sick days, these are random days people can have off without as much restriction on forewarning. This is 2-4 days a year that they ask for, but even so most forget to use them all. This is a relatively small ask. Others include not letting bosses cuss out staff nonstop, reducing sexual harassment, working on soft skills, and making allowances for non typical social behaviors like people that like to fidget or prefer to work while listening to music. These changes are small and simple and offer more freedoms to everyone, not just the group that wants them most.