Thread 520925787

Debunked.

>>520925787 (OP)
That's...the point. They care as much about trees and rocks and indians as they do for their own family and friends.

>>520925787 (OP)
i'm so dfucking drunk

>>520925787 (OP)
>implying liberals care about their parents, their families, and their race.

There's no use lying about things that are common knowledge. You just make yourself out to be a moron.

>>520926839
It doesnt necessarily mean that. Its a graph of their limit, and if they care about these things at all.

>>520925787 (OP)
Not true.
They were not inclusive.

That has been debunked. Someone even emailed the authors of the paper to clarify, and they confirmed that the moral task within the study is exclusive in its allocation.

>>520927091
Good rebu(n)king, anon.

>>520925787 (OP)
I like how every time they try to explain this chart, it just gets more insane.

They care about rocks as much as their offspring.

>>520926839
It doesn’t say they value them the same. Just that they care about the world around them as well and not just their close family.

>>520927091
lmao filthy lying kikes

>>520925787 (OP)
The issue is I don't think these leftists know what it means to "care". For me it's sort of like this:
>red
I would let you stay in my home.
>orange
I would let you in my home as a guest.
>yellow
I would feel a little bad if you died.
>red
I genuinely don't care whether you live or die.

They can claim to love all these people the same but in practice it doesn't amount to jack shit when they wouldn't lift a finger to actually help refugees or whatever if they showed up on their doorstep one day.

This meme has so much potential. They were obviously scared of it and somehow were able to shut it down back when it first went viral. Basically they screeched it was untrue and people stopped memeing it. Now that it’s making a comeback remember how afraid they are and let’s give it some staying power.

>>520927091
Im not saying this graph isnt accurate, but between you and me, it seems awfully unintuitive.
So they must just be virtue signaling, right? And they delude themselves into believing the consequences dont exist?
Also, thanks for the rebunker

>>520926839
All it shows is an out-group preference, which is suicidal on a long enough timeline. The fact they're making themselves look like retards trying to deboonk it is proof it bothers them.
What bothers a dishonest person the most? The truth.

>>520927076
This. The graph is provably true in any instance it's applied to, if anything it just confirms prior observations about their behavior. Professor Ted explained this shit many years ago.

>>520927091
Based rebunker

>>520925787 (OP)
>as much
If you designate care to everything, you end up flattening your ability to care about each specific thing.
Like in all things, if you try to do everything, you become the master of none.

>>520925787 (OP)
>dude... i care about like.... everything in the universe man..... *hits blunt*