Thread 520962014

do you agree with feminists that they should resort to violence to achieve their desired outcomes?

>>520962014 (OP)
Yes. Moids need to die

Like terrorism?
What form would this violence take?

>>520962014 (OP)
Because female feminists are literal women and make feminists are spineless, socially shapeshifting cowards who suck at fighting

>>520962014 (OP)
because women are pussies

>>520962014 (OP)
they could pretty easily latch onto antifa, and conduct some terrorism with them if they so choose.

>>520962014 (OP)
Why does nobody fight back against these freaks, ever, except me? I’m the ONLY guy here with a K/D ratio.

Am I.. the last chad left in america??

>>520962014 (OP)
Niggers are violent and niggers are still niggers crying about EBT. I guess being able to group loot stores is a win?

>>520962014 (OP)
Absolutely. What the world needs now is a lot more psychotic,
emotionally unstable,
extremely violent,
sociopathic women.

>>520962014 (OP)
Is this preddit user advocating for political violence? SHOCKING

>>520962049
you won't do shit, you fat, smelly, trans-adjacent, mentally ill, dysgenic circus freak. You don't even deserve rape, just torture.

>>520962014 (OP)
Feminists used to set off bombs and shit. What is this retard talking about?

>>520963221
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffragette_bombing_and_arson_campaign

Because they'd need guys to fight?

>>520962014 (OP)
They've murdered hundreds of millions of babies, that's pretty violent

>>520962014 (OP)
The British feminists built some bombs in the early 20th century but they were defective and didn’t kill anyone.

>>520962014 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kbkysPTnHc
Social media has primed an environment where this type of degeneracy is not only accepted, it thrives. Social media desensitizes and radicalizes even moderates into believing heinous and abhorrent behavior is acceptable under the correct context. Spend just 5 minutes on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, you will find hordes of these deranged people. They exist among us. The FBI knows about them but never acts until it is far too late. Western society is on a one-way fast track to collapse as long as social media continues to destroy minds and decay the culture.

The feminist leaning male usually has less testosterone levels than the average guy, so it's definitely a numbers thing.

>>520963221
>>520963244
Lmao

>>520962014 (OP)
Yea, so I can retaliate and legallly kill them

>>520962014 (OP)
"Suc dik 4 terrorisms" 'some feminist'

>>520962014 (OP)
No
We should resort to violence AGAINST femminism.

Feminism is a poison that destroys civilisation and it mist be forcefuly removed

>>520962014 (OP)
They should resort to violence so we can speed up beating them

they tried and they sucked at it,

soon, there won't be a society, where they can get away with being retarded and they won't even be heard, but sure, go and try to do some Stop Oil bullshit while they still can lmao

>>520962014 (OP)
Women have become completely delusional. I mean, I guess if they were violent in scattered, isolated events, they might get away with it, since the courts usually simp for them. But, wow. What a dumb fucking question. Woman moment x1000. Lol.

>>520962014 (OP)
The fuck are they talking about? Women have killed more humans than every war combined in like 20 years. Abortion is the single greatest killer of human beings, ever.

>>520962014 (OP)
Yeah sure.
Feminism is the one movement that is prefer get violent instead of ruin media, screen academia, and fuck up work culture through the sheer power of passive aggression.

>>520962049
Ywds lol

>>520962014 (OP)
i dont understand what objectives they have in the developed world, they can have abortions, vote, have a job, etc, idk i think political violence is dysfunctional for everyone because it could descend into civil war

>>520962049
I want you to try lmao
I fucking beg you
My fists and boots are fucking itching
It would be so easy to crush your skull lmao

>>520962014 (OP)
wtf is that bitch on about, the suffrage movement was among the most violet movements in the 20th century.
It involved acts of terror like arson and planting IEDs in civilian infrastructure.
Giving voting rights to women was essentially giving into terrorists.
Fuck 'em, they should have been rounded up and waterboarded to hell.

Violence in the war of the sexes is inherently self defeating and self limiting being directly detrimental to the dissemination and spread of ideals across generations.

>>520963364
Imagine if they had someone in their ranks who actually knew how to put together an IED.
Their intention was to cause mass casualty until their demands were met.
If you look deeper into their acts of terror, they planted explosive devices where there would be mass gathering of people like churches and train stations.

What more do I need as a woman? I already have everything I want. Perhaps forcing men to be accompanied and monitored when outside, chastity belts, and a shock bell when they speak too much.

Yes, they should try to fight me.

>>520962014 (OP)
Women are not prone to violence.
This is similar to leftists. There's the book How to Blow Up a Pipeline advocating for violence to stop climate change. I'm sure the author won't do shit but wants others to do something.

>>520962014 (OP)
good idea let's call it the Feminist's Cookbook

>>520962014 (OP)
They've killed more in a few decades than men have in all of recorded history.

>>520962014 (OP)
Because you don't need to resort to violence if simps do everything for you.
As soon as simping stops 99% of problems will eventually be solved.
Literally all you need to do is make sure women can't do anything that affects us in any real way without our permission and we can create a paradise in a few days of everyone doing this.

>>520962014 (OP)
cos they're weak as fuck, can't organize shit and don't really care all that much.

>>520962014 (OP)
The only time violence worked in the west was the French revolution and it started a war. This people don't even know what violent means

>>520972597
KYS

>women
>successfully committing violence
lol

>>520972964
it's true though. the females in feminism haven't achieved anything by themselves. feminism only got anywhere because men have bent over backwards to give women what they want.
what more do western women even want that is worth using violence for?

>>520962014 (OP)
>feminists that they should resort to violence to achieve their desired outcomes?
>implying they haven't already
Feminism was considered a terrorist movement at one point
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffragette_bombing_and_arson_campaign

>>520962014 (OP)
>do you agree with something an enemy wants
Gee I don't know, maybe I should let them trample over my body too.

>Memeflag
>Twitter screencap
HE DOES HAVE A GOOD POINT
HE'S RIGHT YOU KNOW
NOW THAT THE DUST HAS SETTLED
SAY SOMETHING NICE
POWERFUL
REALLY MAKES YOU THINK
WHAT ARE THE POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
KNEEL
POLITICALLY SPEAKING
APOLOGIZE
BASED OR CRINGE
LET ME GUESS YOU NEED MORE
HOW DO YOU RESPOND WITHOUT SOUNDING MAD
WHAT DID HE MEAN BY THIS
WHY DO AMERICANS
WHO WAS IN THE WRONG
DAILY REMINDER
WELL /POL/
YOUR RESPONSE
IT'S OVER
POL CAN'T REFUTE THIS
THIS IS THE POST THAT KILLED /POL/
POL BTFO
THOUGHTS?

went to heaven in me kip and god gave me 72 wigger starmers for me good deeds
bosh

HE DOES HAVE A GOOD POINT
HE'S RIGHT YOU KNOW
NOW THAT THE DUST HAS SETTLED
SAY SOMETHING NICE
POWERFUL
REALLY MAKES YOU THINK
WHAT ARE THE POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
KNEEL
POLITICALLY SPEAKING
APOLOGIZE
BASED OR CRINGE
LET ME GUESS YOU NEED MORE
HOW DO YOU RESPOND WITHOUT SOUNDING MAD
WHAT DID HE MEAN BY THIS
WHY DO AMERICANS
WHO WAS IN THE WRONG
DAILY REMINDER
WELL /POL/
YOUR RESPONSE
IT'S OVER
POL CAN'T REFUTE THIS
THIS IS THE POST THAT KILLED /POL/
POL BTFO
THOUGHTS?

>>520962014 (OP)
If sex can be an assault then sex can also be a defense, i volunteer my penis to fight feminist terror

>>520962014 (OP)
feminists hate trannies. if they started beating up trannies it would be an impressive display of girlpower and we'd all be impressed.

>>520962731
Disagree. Remember what antifa and blm did with them? “Wall of moms” where they used them as human shields

What more exactly do they want

>>520962014 (OP)
Here i was thinking that killing an unborn child was already a violent act.

>>520962014 (OP)
feminists have resorted to way more violence than men in all the wars of history, sweatie

if you add the millions of abortions to the millions of men ruined, broken and killed by feminism, it appeats uppity bitches are the main cause of hman mortality

>>520962014 (OP)
Because women were never a powerless and oppressed class as their pseudo-Marxist dogma claims.
They were not a class at all, because the basic unit of society was the family, not the individual.

>>520962014 (OP)
>the people that have the highest amount of privileges constantly complain
They really will never be happy until everyone is miserable will they

>>520974125
It's always funny when enemy factions fight eachother.

>>520962014 (OP)
Tailless women should kill themselves.

>>520962014 (OP)
If they want to get fucked up, sure.

>>520962014 (OP)
what is the desired outcome?
all males dead?
bring it on, whores

>>520962014 (OP)
There's only so much physical damage a bunch of women and literal faggots can do

>>520962014 (OP)
they know what damage a punch to the face does and they don't want to receive one. they know they don't have the strength to fight.

women engage in far more subversive tactics than outright violence that men harness: gossip.

>>520962014 (OP)
Well if they want to get beaten and physically destroyed then yes.
Just because you think you're justified doesn't mean it's smart to be violent, see Gaza.

>>520962014 (OP)
there are 73 million abortions every year. their movement has been the bloodiest ever, not even the most fucked up Chinese wars can compete with that number.
even WW2 needed its whole duration to reach that casualty counter.
feminism is the most bloody and brutal ideology ever.

>>520962226
What would a feminist say if I said it's because most pure feminists are females and females are weaker and therefore less prone to violence (as weaker being naturally don't want to escalate or introduce violence when around stronger beings)? In fact, I explained to a chick the other day why men control the world and women do not. It's simply because men have a greater ability to manifest their will in the world, whether it be through mental determination, physical superiority to women, or both. When she said she didn't fully understand, I pointed to a remote sitting on the table and said "pretend whichever one of us can grab and physically retain that remote will decide what goes on that tv indefinitely. I can guarantee you that I will be the one deciding what we watch and only putting on your shit when I am bored or feel like appeasing you." It's a crude example but it is exactly why women will only rule over men when allowed to and the Bible says that anywhere women rule over men, it is a curse as it is unnatural.

>>520962014 (OP)
Men have evolved to be violent. It's not something most women have the propensity for.

>>520963294
Satan appreciates it

>>520962014 (OP)
Yes

>>520962014 (OP)
I agree they should try. For one it would be funny, like when they burnt the Teslas. Or attempted to, a bunch of them set themselves on fire, since they couldn't even figure out a Molotov cocktail. For two that would allow a harsh reprisal on foids. For three women are not meant for violence, outside of violence being gossiping that is.

>>520962074
Most likely something ineffective. These are the same people that think mean posts are akin to a hate crime after all.

>>520978685
I for one of encourage them to try. Again it will be funny to see what kind of violence a bunch of women and male feminists are capable of.

>>520962014 (OP)
because women are physically weak.

because women never fought for anything, the jews started it and simps allowed it.

>>520975983
Testosterone is not tied to aggression directly but instead risk taking behavior. When the risk is removed women are just as violent as men, or more so, like against children or by proxy. This explains the massive kill count by women aborting their babies.

>>520977041
You can’t escape evolutionary psychology. They lack the risk taking to get what they want directly. Complaining is how they get what they want, but cognitive dissonance means they can’t ask for it directly. Only long rituals of beating around the bush to get what they want with plenty of plausible deniability so they don’t feel bad.

>>520963244
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffragette_bombing_and_arson_campaign

That is somewhat respectable.

>>520962014 (OP)
>War of the sexes goes hot
>...
>Fan fiction
>Female army mass in battle lines
>Males come out to shoot all of them
>Females eradicated from the earth
>Males laugh their asses off
>Artificial womb and space cars
please please please please please!

>>520962049
but you're dependant on moids. without moids, you'd starve to death.

>>520962049
I wish a nigga would

women do use violence all the time just not in the physical sense. all of society worships the pussy

We need contamination chamber for every even slightly feministic woman and a simpy male. Then we launch them from the orbit into the fucking sun.

Every fucking problem is caused by a simp or a karen, or both.

>>520962074
>What form would this violence take?
Begging chad to do everything for them.

most radical feminists in the US were jews

>>520962014 (OP)
Women dont fight with violence they fight with social and emotional manipulaition and shaming. So if you think about it women are incredibly violent in their own way because theyre fucking ruthless at bullying, emotional blackmail, and publicly shaming

>>520962014 (OP)
I do agree, because it will morally justify the other side to kill them, regardless of gender. It will remove the "you cannot hit gurls" unwritten law. Everything feminists and women did was always against their benefit. They must now work, they won’t have kids and they will die alone. Most men won’t give a shit about dying alone because dealing a life time with women is worse.

>>520962014 (OP)
Ultimately women gained the vote because the Tory party needed to boost its vote against the working class. They knew women would vote against the interests of their husbands (e.g., greater safety in mines and factories).

Their "campaign" achieved nothing apart from building up an organisation that could be used for handing out white feathers to young men when war was declared.

Pointless and ineffective suffragette violence gets a free pass to this day.

>>520962014 (OP)
0 testosterone in their systems, even the men. You do see incels murdering people for the movement though, they are a bit pent up. When lefties do kill people it's usually men or trans women.

>>520986703
Testosterone is more to do with hierarchy, its quite complex. Men understand hierarchy and also understand what you have to do if you want to change your position in it. Sometimes that is risk taking, sometimes it is violence, sometimes it is accepting the situation. Women do not in any sense.

In actual fact the largest social impact of testosterone is that most men most of the time find it fairly easy to cooperate and work together on shared aims and projects.

Compare this to the complex ritualised behaviour women have to enact just to keep the peace and the whole time they are seething inside anyway. Its like a colour they can't see.