>>520968989
>How can anyone see themselves in Nick?
I've been following him for awhile and his early base was more radical, not less, than the larger base he has now. And those early guys didn't go anywhere. He literally had a groyper pledge where groypers must promise to live and die for Fuentes and I don't think he was being ironic
>the guy said that blue-collar workers are subhumans, or something to that effect
Yeah, he's attacking the grizzled beard plaid shirt redneck stereotype that everyone associates with RWers because that's not what most of the zoomers are
The zoomers that follow him are low status but typically educated, alienated men in big cities
And I actually believe his base would take a much bigger hit if he was caught with actual women the way Henry Sisson was than if he was caught red-handed with trannies, because alienation from women is the defining feature that makes his base identify so strongly with him
You don't have to like that fact, but its just a reality that there's a large segment, perhaps even the majority, of young men who can't form relationships with women and are radicalized on that basis
These are the guys that have nothing to lose from overthrowing the current system and everything to gain from creating a new one. The wifeguys like Matt Walsh have their families to take care of and as a result don't truly have revolutionary energy
