>>521161603
>Apples to oranges
>You're missing the point
>Moot point
I don't even know what you're arguing anon but you sure dropped a bunch of buzz words.
I read your entire post and still have zero clue what argument you're trying to make. I can only assume you disagree with me though I still have no clue why.
>Like 30% of China's GDP is in public works, you'd expect the things they build to not collapse.
Turns out it doesn't matter how much you spend if some corrupt official cuts a ton of corners bud. Also, buying 5 bridges costs more than buying 1 bridge. More news at 11. You don't think they spend 5 bridges worth of money on 1 bridge do you anon?
>The fact that there's bridges to nowhere would normally be a sign of corruption if and only if a country isn't classed as developing, it's why complaining about corruption in China is a moot point.
You're a tard if you think this is a developing country issue and not a corruption issue just saying. China has loads of massive infrastructure projects under its belt - they don't have an issue constructing shit. Not to mention, bridges aren't exactly the hardest thing to build - people have been doing it for millennia and it's not exactly "groundbreaking" civil engineering to build bridges.