>>18005397
>Lincoln genocided 800,000
It wasn't a genocide. It was a Civil War started by the South and fought between two comparable armies. Lincoln also wanted to readmit the South into the Union before the war started, extended the offer in the early stages of the war and then quickly pushed for their readmittance with full rights after, with the only concession being acknowledge of the 13th Amendment. This is far different from say Israel's actual genocide of the population of Gaza, which Trump fully backs and wants to abet by carrying out ethnic cleansin.
>further central banker interests
The war was fought in defense after the South started seizing federal property after illegally seceding from our nation. It had nothing to do with "central banking".
>and destroyed the concept of a free press
Both the Union and Confederacy engaged in anti-First Amendment suppression during the war, however, as you pointed out later, this was not the first time in American history, nor did the right of a free press permanently disappear with Lincoln's four years in office. And while that is a fair criticism of him, it pales in comparison to his triumphs, such as winning the Civil War, restoring the Union, ending slavery, implementing the Homestead Acts, Pacific Railway Act, etc.
>Woodrow Wilson allowed the federal reserve to be created
And?
>and dragged the US into world war 1
Germany did that with its unprovoked attacks and plots against our nation. And the results of WW1 were objectively positive for America. Wilson established us as the preeminent respected power in the world, and had he not been impeded from joining the League of Nations, would have likely prevented WW2.
>before letting his wife run the country
A lot of that is exaggerated. In any event, like Lincoln, it pales in comparison to his achievements, namely WW1 victory, the FTC, modernizing and regulating banking, the income tax, the National Park Service and Clayton Antitrust Act.
