>>18026774 >not ugly >not fat >not muscular but has natty definition >can grow good facial hair >tattoos give a bad boy vibe
I'm just assuming women love this shit
>>18027852
Thats a bit of effort just for something that can be proven wrong in 5 seconds. Besides this thing is mostly retarded. If you post any remotely attractive woman it gives her an 8 or 9.
>>18029096
I don’t know who owns this model. I trust a few publicly traded company like OpenAI or Google with my data more than these smaller indie devs.
>>18029868
A small dev would just pull thousands of pictures from Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, etcetera for these models. Your picture, should they use it, would be a drop in the bucket and make no difference.
>>18027350 >It gives every not obese not egregiously hideous woman I put into it an 8.
This comes right after this pic: >>18027332 >Screenshot_20250617_205543.png