If you have cable you don’t need to pay the extra $30 a month. Doesn’t everyone have cable?

>>18474799 (OP)
I don't know a single person under the age of 65 who still has cable

>>18474806
Are you poor

>>18474799 (OP)
>$30 bucks
the cock was $9. I ain't payin no $30 to (((espn))) and (((disney)))
>>18474806
this

>>18474806
It's available of ESPN+. There is a new tier of ESPN+ that gives you access to more games and content. If you don't have a job it's alot. If you have a job it's an after thought.

>>18475000
This

>>18474799 (OP)
That's honestly incredible then. Free ppvs just for having EPSN anyway?

>>18474831
Yes and in deep debt

>>18475127
>EPSN
Lmfao how the hell did I even do that
>BE QUIET WHILE I'M CONDUCTING MY BUSINESS

>>18474806
be honest, how many people do you know? not counting family.

>>18474799 (OP)
The people who get fucked by this the most are also the ones most likely to know the get out of jail free card.
Simply take your Netflix and VPN into Britain.

>>18475127
Yeah

>>18475131
Sad

If they put UFC PPVs on this as well for $30 a month that’s a steal

>>18475146
Or just use an illegal stream

>>18475160
I thought the WWE and ufc would just be on Netflix but now I think the plan is for everything to be on this new espn thing.

>>18475146
>The people who get fucked by this the most are also the ones most likely to know the get out of jail free card.
The people who are upset about this are poor faggots or edgy teens who think pirating things makes them rebels and not just poor. Everyone else is fine with paying $30 for a ton of entertainment.

>>18475000
I really wish you faggots who call things "sportsball" would stop repeating this dumb shit. ESPN+ has nothing to do with the ESPN network. It doesn't simulcast anything, and it doesn't even hold the same broadcasting deals.
WWE PPVs are now going to be on ESPN, just like a football or basketball game is. They will be broadcast on the actual ESPN channel. You will get a pregame hype show of Screamin' A saying "OH LAWD I CAN'T WAIT TA SEE BROCK LESNAH" You will get Sportscenter highlights of what happens. They will drag out the Inside the NBA, guys to do hype spots. Joe Buck and Troy Aikman will plug the upcoming airing on MNF.
Absolutely none of this will happen on ESPN+ which shows MAC football games with 4000 people in the stands.

>>18475200
>ESPN+ has nothing to do with the ESPN network
Once again the new tier will just do this. It will give cord cutters access to all ESPN linear content and channels.
>ESPN DTC’s unlimited plan will cost $29.99/month that gives fans access to all of ESPN’s linear networks — ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, SECN, ACCN, ESPNews, ESPN Deportes — in addition to ESPN on ABC, ESPN+, ESPN3, SECN+, and ACCNX. All told, the lineup encompasses 47,000 live events each year, on-demand replays, studio shows, original programming and more.
>https://variety.com/2025/digital/news/espn-streaming-service-launch-date-pricing-1236480388/
What do you want to bitch about now?

>>18475151
Based

>>18475216
Did you even read what you posted which directly proves you're an idiot?

>>18475227
I'm not sure how much more words need to be related to you that the streaming service ESPN is debuting will simulcast content. The reaosn they purchased the NFL network and more NFL content, the NBA show and it's content, WWE etc is because they are shifting to a streaming future. If you dont want cable but want ESPN's content period, then you will have that for $30.

>>18475259
Are you legitimately fucking illiterate? No shit the new service will provide a simulcast of all ESPN programming, that is the entire fucking reason it is being created. Most people who have cable now only have it to watch sports on ESPN, which this app will now take care of and likely kill cable off for good. ESPN+ which is the $12 option you are talking about will not have any of this and will continue to broadcast the same content if has for 10 years now.

It’s so funny seeing aewtists continually baffled by the concept of disposable income. Get a job broke nigga.

>>18475200
>Are you legitimately fucking illiterate?
This is you
>ESPN+ has nothing to do with the ESPN network. It doesn't simulcast anything, and it doesn't even hold the same broadcasting deals.
This is the new service
>that gives fans access to all of ESPN’s linear networks — ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, SECN, ACCN, ESPNews, ESPN Deportes — in addition to ESPN on ABC, ESPN+, ESPN3, SECN+, and ACCNX.
Notice it includes ESPN+ up there? Ok now back to you
>ESPN+ which is the $12 option you are talking about
No. I said
>Once again the new tier will just do this
There will be an upgrade for ESPN+ that gets yu access to all the content. Or you can stick to the $12 option for only specific content shared there.
Shut the fuck up. Learn to read.

>>18474831
not everyone still lives with mommy and daddy you colossal faggot
if mommy and daddy are paying everything for you and the only thing you gotta pay is your phone bill, yeah we all would be as rich as you

>>18475331
Kek

>>18475356
Who says I pay my phone bill?

>>18475356
>seething that anons mum and dad love him enough to let him live at home and build wealth
the real KWAB here is (You)

It's free on Kodi.

>>18474806
I have cable because it's bundled in with my internet

>>18475344
Yes you can pay $12 to only receive the same ESPN+ content that you already get if you have ESPN+. You are a legitimate retard and I only wish I could have a live stream of when you try to watch the Royal Rumble and it pops up asking you to pay more and you have to cry to your mom to do it.

>>18474799 (OP)
>required ID for the internet
>no more porn, phone apps, streaming sites and social media without your face attached to it
>cable is coming back
thank you based trump