>>18496141 (OP)
It's amazing to me that out of the 3 fully-black wrestlers that WWE decided were worthy enough to hold the WWE championship (Lashley, Kofi and Big E), only one of them was actually deserving of it (Lashley)
And yet they refused to allow more worthy black wrestlers like Booker T or 'Hall of Pain' Mark Henry to hold it
And now the same thing is happening to R-Truth. Now, do I generally believe that Truth is worthy of being WWE champion? No.
HOWEVER:
We are past the point of 'worthy' wrestlers holding that belt. If one-half of the APA can be suddenly thrown in a suit then given the belt, or if an indian jobber can be skyrocketed to the main event within a couple of weeks to be given the belt, or if two twerking midcard niggas can be given the belt.....then there's no excuse at this point to not give Truth a chance
Truth has put in many years in the company (same excuse that was given for Kofi winning it). He's a fan favorite and usually gets great crowd reactions
But most importantly: Truth was WWE's best realistic chance of salvaging Cena's shitty heel turn
They could have given Truth a transitional title run where he beats heel Cena (not necessarily clean) as a more serious face, then Cena goes full-retard heel and does every heel shit in the book to eventually get his belt back. Then we could have a fully-heel Cena against Cody, Punk, Brock, etc.
Instead they randomly had Truth feuding with fucking Aleister Black of all people. They completely wasted his momentum