>>18507320
>>18507497
Steve Austin was still a better wrestler than Osprey even after the neck injury limited him. Why? Because Austin was believable, he understood ring psychology, and he knew how to tell a story in the ring. Wrestling moves are merely a means to an end. They are NOT the end.
>inb4 you claim I've been brainwashed by WWE
I'm in my 40s and have watched wrestling since the mid 1980s. I started with WCW here in Texas. I was a bigger fan of WCW than WWF. And I don't care for modern WWE outside of a few guys that can still work. Same thing with AEW btw. And no, Osprey isn't one of those guys. He's a flippy merchant who works gymnastics exhibitions most of the time. Danielson is 10x the worker that Osprey is.