>>18551555 (OP) >only 16k in the UK where Tony claims AEW is more popular than WWE
Not impressive at all. We sells more tickets on a typical friday night than this
>>18551555 (OP) >16,622
To think they went from 80,000 in the UK just two years ago all the way down to 16,000. You're right that someone should be mad about this, but it sure as hell isn't the E-gods
>>18551555 (OP)
So? Drawing well for individual shows here and there is absolutely meaningless. AEW needs to draw well for all their shows consecutively. Because right now their average attendance is in the toilet.
>>18551584 >>18551596
Nope. If anything I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt to show just how even more harshly AEW has fallen off. 80,000 or 70,000 one year to 40-50,000 the next, alllllllllllllllll the way down to just 16,000 for this year. Losing more than 50% year to year at this rate. Next year they'll be lucky to have 7,500 by the looks of it
>>18551833 >less than 8 years old
Time to stop using this cope. If they are older than 5 years, they no longer benefit from the new company excuse. Especially when numbers continue to go down and not up
>>18551927
You are the one coping about them being a "less than 8 year old" company. Sounds to me like you don't think it's a good number if you making excuses for it
Just remember your goalpost moving when the normies are even sharing videos of how hot that crowd is after the event. Just accept that it's all changing around you & you're on the wrong side of history.