Thread 18552547

THREAD 2:
Welp, that explains why WWE suddenly got so aggressive.

Continue to discuss WWE’s fears of AEW’s growth here!

>>18552547 (OP)
why are you doing this?

does anyone have the list of nxt numbers on netflix? i remember seeing it on here. it was like 100-150k or something.

>>18552547 (OP)
Even going with a low number like 100K people watching on max (I think its a bit more) then it is a lot closer than WWE would like

>>18552547 (OP)
OH NO NO NO

>>18552554
Dude, I've answered all of your retarded questions. You've still to answer mine.

Just to put things into perspective, HBO MAX isn't even global yet and AEW is still pulling like on average 500k. That's insane

>>18552563
The ESPN deal and the TNA moving to Wednesday report broke them so now they simply refuse to live in this reality

>>18552558
the other 209k+ fans are watching it on max at home. nice try dronie.

It always has to be some magical number pulled from a hat that either matches WWE or passes them.
AEW fans are genuinely fucking pathetic.

TK won

>>18552590
You forgot the O

>>18552582
It's getting scary how deranged they are. I'm afraid they're going to get violent next.

>>18552581
I was skeptical at first but WWE has seemed to confirm was Dave reported based on how seriously they have started taking AEW. I think there's a lot of people that were streaming Dynamite/Collision elsewhere before MAX, which is why live viewership didn't see a substantial dip (in the same way NXT saw a boost moving to free CW) when MAX started

Drones. What number do YOU think dynamite is doing on max. Let’s see the actual deranged headcanon.

I believe both company are dying and barely making money

>>18552605
>I think there's a lot of people that were streaming Dynamite/Collision elsewhere before MAX
It would not surprise me at all if AEW fans refuse to spend money to watch the show they claim to support. That's why they're constantly begging for links to the PPVs they claim are worth the money.

>>18552624
>every thread about how much it will cost to watch WWE now
>just get Netflix and a VPN bro
Ironic post

>>18552563
because if it were the other way around, e drones would make 6 gamethreads and shit up the board for days

why is it only a problem when us aew chads give a little banter back?

>>18552624
cable is a scam, i was only keeping it because it allowed me to watch my local baseball and basketball teams but greedy fucks like those that run TKO started pay walling that shit too so I fuckin CANCELLED it

>>18552624
AEW "fans" don't want their show to improve. They want it to remain a failure so they have their own mark circlejerk sekrit klub.

>>18552631
But I thought they couldn’t afford paying these wrestlers more money now AEW is here?

>>18552642
This is the drone who was pretending he watched Marvelous and not WWE kek.

>>18552642
we don't want drones, that's correct. you anti social fucks would require levels of deprogramming that would not be allowed by western liberal society, it's not worth dealing with you. sorry vince ruined you with years of bbc sissE hypno, but we do not want your kind.

>>18552632
>>every thread about how much it will cost to watch WWE now
Less than it costs to watch them now since you don't need Peacock, and you can log into ESPN with the cable credentials you use to watch SmackDown.

>>18552547 (OP)
920k ??????

>>18552605
>how seriously they take AEW
They don't take them seriously. They are booking shows the same day as them to step on their necks and take viewers from them because they know it wont hurt them. If they were scared, they wouldn't go head to head because then it would affect their numbers

>>18552656
>sorry vince ruined you with years of bbc sissE hypno, but we do not want your kind

>>18552547 (OP)
No wonder the pigs have been squealing so much, I'm sure soon this board will get inindated with pro fed bots and paid pajeets

>>18552558
no milly, pEdo? LMAO

>>18552667
if they didn't take them seriously they wouldn't care more about counter programming AEW than booking their own shows well lmao

>>18552651
I do watch Marvelous and I don't watch WWE.
I'm just tired of you, people like you, and your pajeet Milhouse cult leader ruining the things I enjoy.
>>18552656
>anti social
Ironic coming from a terminally online retard who samefags/spams all fucking day. Lmao.

>>18552667
>don’t take them seriously
>work their entire schedule around their shows
>hotshot retirement angles so they can go against AEW
>set up matches then don’t do them for another month for no reason at all so they are against AEW
>prop up TNA and do their negotiations for them to get them a tv deal against AEW
Yeah I’m sure they don’t care.

>>18552682
>no milly, pEdo? LMAO
Yeah AEW hasn't drawn a milly in I think 2 years?

>>18552690
You seem really scared there lil troon bro. TNA got ya feeling a certain way?

>>18552688
>I watch marvelous and don’t watch WWE
>I spend hours all day defending WWE on every topic
Shit LARP drone.

>>18552690
This is a dick-swinging contest and WWE bullying AEW by showing how much more popular they are than them. WWE will crush them in ratings.
But you can't see that because autism.

>>18552697
Hopefully Kenny Omega is next

>WWE hits no milly
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
LOOK WHO JOINED THE CLUB YOU STUPID FAGGOTS, ENJOY YOUR SLOP LMAOOOOOOOOO

>>18552699
>defending WWE
Show me one comment where I defended WWE, please.
Can you do that or will you deflect again?
You and people like you are an invasive species. You ruined the good things and ran good fans off.

>>18552705
>wwe will crush them in ratings
>puts their shows against PPV’s
Do you ever read what you type or does it just come spewing out?

>>18552690
Its quite hilarious they were too scared to move NXT back to Wednesdays which they easily could have when it moved to the CW, but they didn't cause they knew it would get raped just like last time. So TNA has to be the punching bag. Some partnership kek

>>18552719
You’re in this thread you dumb bitch. I don’t think the possibility of AEW getting 209,000 on max is going to affect if marigold can sell out their next show. Your LARP is shit.

e drones in the MUD

>>18552729
>Its quite hilarious they were too scared to move NXT back to Wednesdays which they easily could have when it moved to the CW, but they didn't cause they knew it would get raped just like last time. So TNA has to be the punching bag. Some partnership kek
Remember the last time that NXT moved to Wednesday and Tony was so scared he started Dynamite an hour later and still lost? LMFAO

>>18552735
Dynamite lost to NXT when NXT had to move KWAB

>>18552667
>>18552669
no milly, pEdos?

>>18552547 (OP)
I like that the fed is great at finding the right angle to push every time and the pigs are too stupid to understand the details, 900K live worldwide for WWE has to be way below expectations I would imagine Netflix was expecting at least 2 million based on what the fed was doing before their deal

>>18552729
NXT beat AEW by a mile the last time it ran on a Wednesday.

>>18552741
Correct like I answered you last time here >>18552697 AEW hasn't had a million in 2 years, that's with both of their shows. I would say 4 but Rampage and Battle of the belts were cancelled this year

>>18552746
why ya cryin bt

Are we actually going to have anyone give their opinion on what they think the max number is if you find 209,000 impossible or have you all realized it will show how deranged you are when you say ‘I think it’s getting 0 viewers’

>>18552547 (OP)
For the record, this is actually quite bad for WWE.
They debuted on Netflix to SIX MILLION VIEWERS in January.
Now we're in August and down to 920k.
That's almost a million lost per month. What the fuck happened?

>>18552723
And which will win? Which one will get more hits?
>>18552732
>can't back his claims up
>can't post proof
>keeps being a loser
I accept your concession.
Now what makes you think that 209K people watch on MAX? Surely you've got proof or an indicator? Something MUST have happened for you to be sitting on this number like it's a Batista action figure.

>>18552748
Do you resort to calling everyone bt after AEW is exposed as the pedo fed? you're not mad are ya pedocrip?

>>18552744
You can't just make up numbers that don't exist and then claim WWE is terrified of your made up numbers.

Not brave enough to post this on your twitter big Trev?

>>18552751
What happened is that AEW got a lot of really bad news, so they've started pretending that WWE is getting very bad ratings to make themselves feel better.

>>18552755
Yesterday he admitted to being a PDF so he's really mad.

>>18552766
Ding Ding Ding!

>>18552756
So are you saying that AEW’s number is made up and lower but WWE’s is made up and higher. Is that really what you have resorted to.

>>18552754
>Something MUST have happened for you to be sitting on this number like it's a Batista action figure.
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>18552740
Cable vs Network, all factors being the same AEW is a better more popular product and let's be honest AEW would be getting half of what RAW is getting if they were the ones on Netflix. Popularity wise Main WWE > AEW > Secondary WWE > TNA, quality wise it is another story but I don't want to console war

>>18552766
...but WWE IS getting bad ratings though.

>>18552780
Show me what CW averaged last year and do the same with TBS. Take your time fatso

>>18552785
According to the numbers that you've made up and that don't exist.

>>18552785
Can you post an official report? Show a receipt?
Or are you retardedly clutching to some biased retard's headcanon?

>>18552755
>>18552763
>>18552767
>>18552779
silocord just woke up

>>18552785
So if WWE is getting bad ratings when every show is beating AEW what does that say about AEW?

>>18552796
I accept your concession fatso

>>18552794
Especially since on their earnings call Netflix said WWE was everything they hoped for and more.

>>18552797
It’s the opposite. If it’s plausible that dynamite might have got near or passed Raw this week what the fuck does that say about what’s happening with Raw?

>>18552797
what it says is WBD is getting a steal for AEW given WWE is getting an order of magnitude more money for ratings that are not that much better. alternatively you could say WWE is fleecing Netflix I suppose.

pigs are extra salty this Friday afternoon, the BBQ is going to be ruined

>>18552806
>It’s the opposite
You can't just make things up, you know you have to back up what you say right?
>>18552808
WBD low balled Tony and they still overpaid, the PPV buys are so bad they don't even want to put the slop on Max.

>>18552812
TNA is going to crush Dynamite

>>18552803
of course management is going to say that to their investors what did you expect "we got swindled please don't fire us"?

>>18552821
Must be why WBD never talks about AEW lmao

>>18552818
>all of these numbers are fake
If you want to believe WWE is doing 1.8 million live you HAVE to accept it’s plausible that dynamite is doing 209,000+ on max. You can’t just say every number is fake if it doesn’t fit into your version of reality.

>>18552794
Listen retard, we both know how this will go. I'll find a report, you'll say it's made up. I find proof, you say "it doesn't matter". I show WWE is lying, you say "quit being such a mark for AEW", etc, anything and everything to stay within your console warring cope. You know it's true. Stop being a jackass and giving your brain the runaround, despite how much empty space there is to roam freely on there.
>>18552797
I don't watch AEW but all I know is there hasn't been a genuinely hot angle on the show ever since MJFPunk, so that's on them. But this kind of logic is retarded to begin with. It's like being surprised Walmart outselling a local grocery store or that UFC has more viewers than a local MMA league.

>>18552820
afraid to send NXT?

>>18552821
kek to be fair that's more or less what lachlan said on the fox earnings call. also said drones were poor and stupid. slopdown was cancelled a short time later.

>>18552547 (OP)
Can you verify if AEW did in fact get More viewers from Max to help bolster your ratings? Aew fans have nothing to celebrate here y'all stuck spexulating

>>18552825
yes because they are actually meeting expectations no need to save face with lies

>>18552803
>their earnings call
It was VP of sports in an interview. Why the fuck don’t you just take a minute to search before posting inaccurate bullshit. This is why no one listens to you, you have no fucking clue what you are talking about.

>>18552826
Who said Raw is doing 1.8 million Live? what are you talking about psycho?
>>18552827
I don't remember asking or caring what you watch or don't watch, let's stay on the subject

>>18552566
>>18545464

>>18552827
Or, and hear me out, you're a retarded cunt who can't ever back anything up.
Post proof.
The fact that you're sitting in your house, sweating and obese, pissing and shitting yourself over made up stories is really quite sad.

>>18552828
The last time they did they wiped the floor with AEW troony

>>18552842
So are you accepting of the Raw number in the OP picture or not?. You keep flipping and flopping on things it’s hard to take you seriously.

>>18552849
Then why don’t they do that now? We all know why.

>>18552855
Am I accepting Meltzer lying like he always does? no. Do you have any proof on any of it or do you just choose to believe a 70 year old man who lies about everything because you wish it was true? what have I flipped on retard?

>>18552842
I don't remember asking you to make retarded statements but you seem to be willing to do that to the chagrin of everyone else. Regardless, it's inferred context, which might be a concept too advanced for your peabrain, but that's why I mentioned whether I watched AEW. You now have 1 more point of IQ. You're welcome.

>>18552547 (OP)
>200k viewers
>on Max

>>18552862
>We all know why.
NXT would beat them again?

kek this got the piggiEs squealing

>>18552862
Because CW wants them on Tuesday?

>>18552863
So what the fuck are you flipping about. What exactly do you think Raw is doing on Netflix? Give me the exact number you think it’s doing.

all timer bt gigamelty in progress
who knew 664k would be the good ol' days

>>18552838
Oh you're right, the earnings call was when the CEO of Netflix talked about how WWE has been great for the business because WWE fans are subscribing and staying subscribed, often at the highest tier, and they're being shown advertising more than most subscribers.

>>18552547 (OP)
Oof WWE but being this close to the second tier pissant competition can't be a good thing

>>18552883
You know multiple people are making fun of you for being a retard right? I don't know what the Netflix numbers are. The b est bet would be to compare them to Smackdown right?

>>18552891
ayyyyy that motherfucker dunking on ad slurping drones kekek

>>18552869
No AEW would move to Tuesday likely Or maybe they wouldn’t if NXT didn’t beat them. But what they are gonna do is put TNA on Wednesday and help them. It’s not going to work though because WWE fans are not going to watch NXT TNA after about week 2. This is when TNA are fucked because WWE will quickly distance themselves from it when it doesn’t work and they are going to end up in a very bad position and probably move days.

>>18552906
I find it much more likely it will stay on Thursday anyway. The report is that they're open to moving to Wednesday but I don't think it will happen. But I've been watching Impact since Jordynne Grace showed up on NXT, and I've bought every PPV since then.

>>18552906
You're so fucking scared of TNA and I cannot stop laughing

>>18552547 (OP)
Fire that fucking fraud, I'm tired of Triple H fucking us over, he already fumbled Cena what the hell do we have left? another Cody chapter? Roman coming back full time? what the fuck

>>18552891
https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2025/07/17/netflix-nflx-q2-2025-earnings-call-transcript/
Again why lie? This information is easily accessible. You just look like a misinformed rube.

>>18552935
It was in the Q1 call.

>>18552939
So before the numbers fell of a cliff. Got it. Very useful information to have if they did actually say that.

>>18552935
>And if you look at our current capabilities around live, we are in just a completely different place today compared to when we first started. As a good example that just happened last Friday, we had our first concurrent pair of live events. We had Taylor versus Serrano globally delivered alongside WWE SmackDown, was delivered ex-US. Both events at scale and delivered with extremely high quality. So it is great progress we have seen, and we have got a great roadmap ahead of us to continue to enhance those experiences.

Absolutely based

>>18552952
I understand you are very stupid but that is them saying how happy they are that they managed to stream two live events at once without the platform crashing. It has nothing to do with WWE aside from one of the events being Smackdown.

>>18552950
The numbers have been very consistent. Comparing the first episode to an average episode is disingenuous. The show is in the top ten on Netflix literally every single week.

>>18552950
And then the sports EVP said it was everything they could have wanted and more. Can you pull up what Zaslav or anyone else from WBD has said about AEW in the past 3 months?

Why do AEW trannies act like emasculated gaslighting victims all the time?

Can we see the "variety of places"?

>>18552964
Oh I know this one! Zaslav said that sports have not been a big driver to Max!

>>18552963
Go and have a look up at the picture in the OP and then consider how you feel about it.

>>18552962
>NOOO EVERYTHING HAS TO BE NEGATIVE WHEN THEY TALK ABOUT WWE
you live a very sad and empty life

>>18552964
Pretty sure when they signed the new deal that showed how they felt.
Anyway are you ok with the numbers above yet or are you still buzzing about the plausibility of the max number?

>>18552971
>AEW gets 10,000,000,000 views and Raw gets 0 views
>How do you feel about that, e-drone?

>>18552986
Imagine pissing, shitting, and farting in joy of made up numbers.
Tell us, schizo. What makes you think the MAX numbers are anything special? What makes you think that they're getting hundreds of thousands?

>>18552992
Not what it says is it. What it says is that it’s plausible that raw has dropped to where dynamite is now. We’ve just had 400 posts about this. Catch up

>>18552986
You mean the 3 year deal? Even NXT got 5. That has to bode well for AEW right? So much confidence. The fake numbers? Unless you finally posted real numbers and I missed it.

>>18553001
>What it says is that it’s plausible that raw has dropped to where dynamite is now.
That's obviously not true though

>>18552998
What number do you think they are getting? I think 200,000 is plausible. What do you think the number is?

Is this WON article even real? I don't see it on their site, their twitter and no reddit threads about it

>>18552992
drones are such overly dramatic faggots lmao

>>18553013
>I think 200,000 is plausible.
Why?
I think they'll get 10-25K.

>>18553021
Right. And what number do you think Raw is doing on Netflix live?

>>18553013
>AEW gets more views than NBA games
damn /pw/ trannies really are stupid

>>18553015
Cripple and the Mexican are ridin’ hard solo on they wrestling figs cause im guessing some bad news happened with AEW

>>18553024
I don't know. 1,000,000 plus anyway. I don't care about their numbers.
Now, again, for the tenth time, what makes you think that AEW is getting 200K?

>>18553036
>I don’t care about the numbers
Stop deflecting little drone. Now up there if you look it says Raw gets 920,000 live and same day views. Are you ok with that number?

>>18553044
Can you link to the article that cites that number?

>>18553044
>up there
According to Meltzer. Where's his sources if they're so readily available?
And why can't you ever answer any questions?

>>18553044
Brandon Thurston said it drew 1.8 million based of an actual formula. Are you okay with that number?

>>18552547 (OP)
mods sticky this

>>18553054
The diabetic cripple is going to say Thurston is wrong and Meltzer is right. Wait for it.

>>18553054
Ok let’s go with this one.
Now if you say that Raw on Netflix is getting 1.8 million live viewers and you also say that dynamite on max is getting 10-25k streaming viewers you are completely and I mean this sincerely completely insane or you have a very slow minded understand of how this all works.

>>18553054
>thurstons numbers aren't made up because they make me feel better
>meltzers numbers are made up because they make me feel bad

>https://wrestlingnews.co/wwe-news/wwe-raw-climbs-million-viewers-netflix-chart/#:~:text=This%20performance%20marks%20a%20significant,show%20since%20early%20February%202025.
>3.0 million views
>5
>6.1 million hours viewed worldwide

>>18553065
I'm not saying it. brandon is. Are you upset?
>>18553066
That's exactly what you're doing with a 70 year old man who always lies. Go on show me how Meltzer came up with the number fatso

AEW bros please make another gamethread once this hits 300

>>18553066
Thurston at least shows his work. Meltzer just says shit and if anyone questions him he has an autistic spergout

>>18553065
What has WBD themselves reported on the Dynamite max numbers?

>>18553069
Notice how the schizo ignores actual factual articles?
>5
And that's worldwide. Not just the US.

>>18553065
>Smackdown gets 1.5 milly on cable
>Raw is the better show
>somehow Raw gets half these numbers while being on the #1 streaming app
>Dynamite gets 650k on cable
>somehow gets almost the same number of streaking views on the fifth most popular streaming app
Dave's a complete pants shitting retard at this point and if you believe him, you must be too

>>18553080
It doesn’t matter if they report it or not. If you think Raw every week has 1.8 million live and same day viewers then you HAVE to accept that 200,000 max viewers is a plausible number. That is saying dynamite is doing around a ninth of Raws viewership which is a completely plausible amount.

>>18553094
slopdown lost a million+ viewers quite literally over night moving from broadcast back to cable. not outlandish to think raw is doing horribly after a similar type move, especially with how fucking weird and gamey netflix is with the data

so no one is going to link this non existent article the OP is citing? AEW trannies are making threads about fake news now because they are so desperate?

>>18553100
>Thurston going off of what Netflix has said in the past and the numbers they provide every week
>WHO THE FUCK CARES THAT WBD HASN'T TALKED ABOUT THE NUMBERS ONCE YOU JUST HAVE TO BELIEVE IT OKAY!?
Too much of Tony's jizz is rotting your brain

>>18553100
>HAVE to accept that 200,000 max viewers is a plausible number.
Why?
What makes you think that?
Can you answer for once, retard?

>>18553101
Meltzer's numbers are made up because everyone tells them they are besides the shameless shills who talk in hypebolic ways about AEW and call it a fact as well

>>18553111
Basically, yes.

>>18553118
Metlzers numbers are made up because he is a retard who is almost 70 years old.

>>18553075
>worked
nothing shows greater weakness than copying memes and not even using them correctly

ya seethe?

>>18552933
>another Cody chapter?
At this point the only reason I still tune in. I’ve stopped watching Raw altogether, and I’m damn sure not looking forward to when the NXT geeks take the spotlight. No Cody = no watchy

>keeps talking about 200,000 MAX viewers
>can't explain why

>>18553115
Because 1/9 of Raws number is a completely plausible amount of viewers. Raws 2014 average was 1,630,000. Dynamites was 701,000. Let’s say 1 in 3 to raw just to round it up. The whole point of this thread is is 200,000 possible on max. If on tv raw was 3 to 1 viewers for dynamite its is completely PLAUSIBLE to say that dynamite is doing 1 viewer for every 9 viewers streaming Raw. Now listen and please actually listen. I’m not saying this number is right. I’m not saying here is a source. I’m saying this number is PLAUSIBLE and if you think it’s not it’s because you are genuinely insane.

Going to be a long weekend in the silo

I always suspected Drainmaker was a anti AEW troll larping as a AEW fan since shortly after he makes retarded claims, the opposite happens. Now he is citing a non existent WON article and look at how many retarded AEW trannies bought it

>>18553161
>PLAUSIBLE
No, it isn't. You're hitting us with retarded what ifs and hypotheticals.

>>18553186
I think you might genuinely be retarded bro.

>>18553161
So you typed all that and you still have no source? You're just making numbers up because you're an angry faggot?

>>18553192
Your argument is built on hypotheticals and what ifs, retard.
AEW's TV numbers are still horiffic and haven't changed since they signed the MAX deal. Why do you assume that hundreds of thousands of people who never bothered with AEW before suddenly developed an interest in the subpar garbage as soon as it went on MAX?

>>18553161
>Because 1/9 of Raws number is a completely plausible amount of viewers. Raws 2014 average was 1,630,000. Dynamites was 701,000. Let’s say 1 in 3 to raw just to round it up. The whole point of this thread is is 200,000 possible on max. If on tv raw was 3 to 1 viewers for dynamite its is completely PLAUSIBLE to say that dynamite is doing 1 viewer for every 9 viewers streaming Raw. Now listen and please actually listen. I’m not saying this number is right. I’m not saying here is a source. I’m saying this number is PLAUSIBLE and if you think it’s not it’s because you are genuinely insane.

The summarized version is: "I made it up"

>>18553206
I think you might also genuinely be retarded bro. I’d really like to hear where you dragged that 10-25k number out of when I just showed you why I think 200,000 is plausible

>>18553216
I never said 10-25k as I said before there are probably 4 people here making fun of how much of a dumbfuck you are.

>>18553210
I just told you. Did you not read it. What a you basing your opinion on? Nothing?

>>18553154
Oi piggiE bitch
Thats because Big Dave doesnt owe ya an explanation
If Big Dave says its true then it is motherfuckin true
Simple as

>>18553161
Why would Dynamite get 100k less than it does on cable? That's what makes no sense to me. There is not a 60/40 split between cable and HBO Max watchers that would make this make sense. 100k maybe and thats being generous

>>18552986
The point is Raw NXT & Smackdown beats AEW in live viewers on all platforms, Meltz is saying AEW still has an attribute (HBO Max) that gives them a fighting chance when comparing ratings.

>>18553220
>there are 4 drones on the board buzzing about
That we can agree on

>>18553232
You live in a reality of your own, my friend. Im sorry we broke you so hard that your mind felt the need to do this to you.

>>18553232
4 E-chads dunking on the sole AEWtist

>>18553229
No the point is 209,000 is a very plausible number. You can pick whatever raw numbers you want but you can’t say raw is doing 1.8 million streaming and dynamite is doing 48k unless you are an insane person who has a very slow grasp on this. Now you can say raw is doing 900,000 and dynamite is doing 48k if you want but then you have to consider what the fuck has happened to raw.

>>18553221
I did read it, and it was nothing but hypothetical retardation.
AEW gets the same horiffic ratings that it has always gotten. Where have the magical 200K people come from?
>>18553222
Wash.

>>18553223
Ya oinkin piggiE ass doesnt know better than Big Dave ya bitch
Big Dave has been doin this shit for over 40 years!
Yer just a retarded 4chiz NEET faggot
Yer word means nothing
This is all 'bout Big Dave

>>18553248
>>18553069
RAW got 3,000,000

>>18553249
Those 200k people are EliteTITANS ya piggie bitch
Actually we are in fact 500k strong on HBO MAX (oh hell yea)
Big BJ Bethel confirmed it
Stay OINKIN ya piggiE bitch
We raped SLOPdown and Rawetty to smithereens!!

So is anyone going to show their methodology behind the claim that AEW is getting 200k on MAX?

>>18553267
I just did you fucking retard.
>>18553161
The best the drones could come up with was attendance, ratings not as good as raw, I think no one’s watching because I don’t like it.

>>18553262
would gayew fans watch on cable because they know it will boost the number?

why don't you have a "watch on cable night" and really show those chuds what real wrestling is!

>>18553267
Will you just let us have this? we're currently afraid of the possibility of TNA moving to a Wednesdays.

>>18553267
Big Dave has a mathematical forumla ya piggiE bitch
An oinkin piggiE like ya wouldnt get it tho
Coz piggiEs like ya cant do math lmao!!!

So can a single tranny link to the WON article that OP is referring to? Does this article even exist?

>>18553281
TNA will stay on Thursday

>>18553267
I just think it's hilarious for the longest time they were insisting it's 500k on Max, then when they admitted they have no proof, they rolled that number back to 200k. There's no way it's more than like 20-30k at absolute most.

>>18553161
>all this talk out of your ass
You need to get put into a Steiner recliner dude

>>18553325
Why? Can you actually explain why you think it’s 30k without doing the buzzzzwords.

im tired of e-chuds arguing about attendence. aew picks smaller areanas to help them out and also its a more intamite feeling. unlike TKO coporate slop where they just try to cram you edrones into a tin can to make money off of you

>>18553342
Not him, but that's a far more realistic number than hundreds of thousands of people who suddenly developed an interest in shit wrestling.

>>18553346
This thread was made by AEW trannies citing a non existent news article you concern trolling tranny

>>18553361
It’s like talking to a Down’s syndrome patient talking to drones. Do you also assume that every single Raw viewer is the exact same people who were watching on USA? Are you that stupid?

>>18552547 (OP)
Hold up aewtists actually think dynamite are pulling 200k?
Why doesn't collision?

>>18552637
Because we're making fun of you sucking, and you're being bitter and punching up because you maybe, possibly, hypothetically, any week now have a win coming up. It's shoot sad and not bantz in any way.

>>18553380
No, why?
The key difference is that WWE is massively popular. AEW isn't.

>>18552547 (OP)
Such a grim wrestling war

>>18553391
well for me i watch collision on tv because saturday night is board game night with my friends so i leave it on the background as we play settles of catane

All this thread about this fake non existent WON article shows is how enraged and full of anger AEW trannies are when they blow up like this over fake news.

>>18553417
saturday nights alright for gaming

>>18553405
No the key similarity is to non wrestling fans ALL wrestling is shit that they have no interest in watching every week.
Now as I’ve explained you can agree that Raw is doing 930,000 and say dynamite is doing 50k. You can take the Netflix number and say that raw is doing 1.8 million or whatever they are saying and agree it’s plausible in that case that dynamite is doing 200k
But you cannot say that raw is doing 1.8 million live viewers and dynamite is doing sub 50k without coming across as completely deranged. That is a deranged drone take and no one has explained why it’s possible because it’s impossible to explain without having a melty about AEW and how much do you don’t like it.

>>18553446
>n..n..no u are deranged
Do you realize you are blowing up over a OP tweet citing a non existent WON article? You and every other AEW fan posting in this thread over fake shit are deranged lunatics.

>Drones don't know what "plausible" means
Lachlan was right

>>18552547 (OP)
>Drainmaker
LOL. So much CrippleHog samefagging over nothing. He’s really scared of TNA!

>>18552607
20k if that. No chance it's any more, high chance it's actually in the 5k range. No evidence to the contrary.

>>18553248
HBO Max viewer count is different from live viewers, AEW got 690,000 live viewers when it aired on TBS

>>18553446
>No the key similarity is to non wrestling fans ALL wrestling is shit that they have no interest in watching every week.
Okay, so where did the magical 200K come from then?

>>18553461
its funny that edrones and trump supports all of the sudden care about sources and science


HA give me a break

>>18552547 (OP)
Wait, isn't that Tony's burner account?

>>18553469
See. Like some kind of special needs person. Why even bother posting, I already have accepted you are like this.

>>18553473
from the data anon...why is it so hard to understand

>>18553475
Trump out of nowhere.
LMAO aewtists can't stop losing.

>>18553475
>no source
I accept your concession tranny. You are insane and delusional.

>>18553473
That’s not what the topic is. Jesus fucking Christ. The topic is if you think WWE is getting 1.8 million live streamers then it is entirely plausible that dynamite is getting 200,000+. Do you need to take a screenshot of what the word plausible means? It means believable, do you know that word?

>>18552547 (OP)
TNA got the PigCripple making up fake tweets and ratings LMAO!

>>18553492
Can you provide the data?

>>18553505
It really do be like that

>>18553248
>No the point is 209,000 is a very plausible number.
No, it's not. Like others have pointed out, the much more popular NBA only gets ~50k viewers on HBO Max. There's no way AEW is secretly getting 4 times the viewers that NBA does.

And, like others already pointed out in this thread, if Dynamite was truly beating Raw in total viewers, Tony would be shouting it from the rooftops just like when Dynamite was beating NXT.

The pendulum swings pigs, your time is coming, you can try to use TNA as a shield but you can't stop the pendulum

>>18553492
Where? Post it.

>>18553342
>Can you actually explain why you think it’s 30k without doing the buzzzzwords.
Because NBA only draws less than 50k on average, and AEW simply is not as popular as the NBA. It's not rocket science.

>>18553503
>WWE gets this therefore AEW MUST be getting that
Get help, you bizarre autistic cunt.

>>18553531
No dronie lol I won't

>>18553525
TK can only post what he can verify officially, dirtsheets can post whatever number are fed to them, I bet you AEW management actually has a very good idea of their metrics same as WWE even if WBD and Netflix won't officially give it to them

>>18553492
KWAB

>>18552581
what countries still dont have hbo max yet? I'd presume europe and australia would have it by now

>>18553552
And where is the ai getting it's data?

>>18553525
Oh my fucking god. Go to /sp/ and ask how many people are watching NBA on max, you will get laughed off the board. This is a WRESTLING topic. If you think that raw is doing 1.8 million live you HAVE to accept that it is plausible(believable) that dynamite is getting 200,000+. That is a completely rational thing to say and only drones have a problem with it. You see how I’m not saying I have a problem with you saying raw is doing 1.8 million. That’s fine you can say it. But it’s plausible (believable) in that situation that dynamite is doing 200,000. Or you can say dynamite is doing less if you want. But then it becomes more plausible(believable) that meltzers reporting on raw is accurate.

>>18553552
>AI Overview
This is just pathetic, man. This isn't proof of anything.

>>18553552
link the source its citing. Click the chain icon and paste it here. Also tell us what prompt you used to get this

>>18553552
>AI
>within the first 24 hours
LMAOOO

>>18553569
See a psychiatrist.

>>18553569
kek I love how this AEWTitan has to keep showing what plausible means because he knows the pedopigs don't, great job educating the fedophiles bro make sure to wipe your feet after you kick them these fat fuckers are nasty

>>18553569
>AEW gets high numbers because WWE does
It's amazing how these trannies brains work. No logic or anything. It's always comes back to "whatabout WWE". This is literal insanity.

>>18553541
no one who enjoys watching the NBA is watching non-exclusive NBA games on MAX. i get e-drones don't have any understanding of sports or basically anything outside of e-slop, but this is a retarded thing to base your viewership estimates off of for obvious reasons.

>>18553552
>ai overview
>literally "I made it the fuck up"

>>18553552
damn this really hurt the drones feelings

>>18553596
Do you understand what plausible means?

>>18553564
reputable places

>>18553560
*shrugs* It isn't in Canada atleast

>>18553596
>if WWE is only doing this much then AEW must be doing much less

>>18552581
> HBO MAX isn't even global yet and AEW is still pulling like on average 500k. That's insane
Yeah, insane because it's simply a made up number. The only source for the hypothetical extra 500k viewers on Max was random dipshits on Twitter with "insider info" insisting it's true. It's just some random number they made up because AEW hasn't had over a million viewers in two years. So if they take the ratings Dynamite was getting at the time (~550k) and add an extra 500k, that gets them to over a million viewers. It's just hypothetical nonsense fanboys made up as a coping mechanism.

>>18553616
Yes

This back and forth can be over with this one question.

Has WBD ever provided a number either on a press release or an earnings call on how many people are watching AEW on Max.

Yes or no.

Again no long tangent. Just yes or no. And if the answer is yes link the source

>>18553607
drones have no culture, drones have no Renoir kek, salty pigs are bubblin' and boilin'

how come e drones lose their MINDS when there is finally 1 anti wwe thread?


. . . S
. . . K
T H I N
. . . N

>>18553624
Sorry they haven't released numbers since it's REALLY bad.

>>18553552
>Can you provide the data?
>NOOOOO NOT LIKE THAT

>>18553608
>wrestling news sources
So just the same dirt sheets that constantly post made up lies to get clicks from desperate fans. Got it.

Netflix has a history of cancelling shit randomly so im hoping something funny happens lol

>>18553624
no, so?

>>18553607
Just because WWE does well doesn't mean their competitor does well. This isn't how business or logic works retard. If you were right then no business would ever go out of business because they do just as good as their competitor. This is how stupid you sound and of course you are the faggot that replies to yourself on your phone >>18553631 pathetic

>>18553616
Never said that tranny. What a godawful and lazy "no u"

>>18553638
yeah usually right after they say how great something is doing too, makes u think

>>18553624
Listen to me drone. Listen. Plausible. Means. Believable. Like when you believe something is likely. Like remember when you wanted Cody to win the belt. It was plausible he was going to win at WM39 right? But he didn’t. But it was PLAUSIBLE. And remember when he got another shot at WM 40?. It was plausible that he was gonna win. And he did! Remember that.
So the point of this is are these numbers plausible and depending on your opinion of the raw rating that changes how plausible a realistic guess would be on the dynamite ratings. But it’s not going to be the exact number. It’s going to be what’s realistic based on the things we know. Plausible!

>>18553651
And it's not plausible that dynamite pulls those numbers.

>>18553648
Doing 1/9th of their streaming viewership is not ‘doing well. But it is a realistic number for them to be doing. Which is the whole point of this thread.

>>18553651
People have repeatedly pointed out to you why 200k isn't plausible. Go outside or something, man. This is just sad and weird.

No millE? LOL

>>18553661
If you think raw is doing 1.8 million it is entirely plausible that dynamite is doing 200,000 unless you are a drone who can’t think.

>>18553672
KEK

>>18552547 (OP)
3 MILLY, LOONEY TROONEY.

>>18553672
LMFAO

>>18553679
>If you think raw is doing 1.8 million
I don't
So I guess I am right.

>>18553667
>But it is a realistic number for them to be doing
Its not though at all you just pulled it out of your ass
>Which is the whole point of this thread.
No the whole point of this thread is you and other AEW trannies fell for a tweet from a non existent load and shot your loads showing how much WWE angers you by parading this fake news

>>18553671
There hasn’t been a single post in nearly 500 posts that have even remotely explain how dynamite can be doing 1/36 of Raws live viewership. You could go and find the lowest rated dynamite of a year and compare it to the highest raw and it wouldn’t get close to that number.

>>18552547 (OP)
wow Meltz is throwing anything at the wall to see what sticks

>>18553616
All you have to do is actually study how successful HBO Max has been as streaming platform with retaining viewers. This isn't about WWE, you're making baseless claims.

>>18553679
>plausible that dynamite is doing 200,000
Only on Planet Retard.

>>18552547 (OP)
these people are legitimately deranged

E-drones have constructed a prison for themselves with the obsession over ratings, in particular obsession over arbitrary numbers, not having understood how stupid that was given how all television, but wrestling especially, has been trending for the last twenty years or so. It's funny because these numbers actually cause legitimate mental pain to them, as you can see in this thread. Vince should be sent to the Hague for what he did to them, it's awful.

>>18553699
Netflix has 81 million in the US, Max had 50 million US.

>>18553699
That’s fucking nonsense that you’re blowing out of your faggot PigTranny ass because you’re scared of TNA, PigWheelys.

>>18553685
live in the US?

>>18553710
What do you expect? They spam anti WWE threads all day, post fake news like this then make threads about how they are victims and how WWE fans are mean to them. It's pretty insane how an entire fed whose fanbase is liberal mostly uses the same arguing and gaslighting tactics liberals use.

>>18553713
>with the obsession over ratings
This thread (2nd one about this topic) was made by AEW trannies and the article cited in the OP doesn't even exist. This is how insane you trannies are.

>>18553651
There is no need to talk about "plausible" or "believable" with the numbers of who watches on a streaming platform. The Streamng owner knows exactly what they are. There is no inferencing like with Nielsen ratings, which take a sample of viewers who have boxes and then tries to apply a statistical constant across the audience of a platform for the same content. That's old. Places like Netflix and Max got away from that with their own platforms because it allows them to know exactly what the number is, what the demographic is, and what the content consumed is. When something is a success the platform owner shares the info because it's great PR. When something doesnt perform well they dont release anything because there is no sense putting bad numbers out. The reason you think otherwise is because you listen to Dave Meltzer who first thought Nielsen was the be all end all, without understanding it didnt count streaming numbers, and now thinks streaming numbers are similar to Nielsen numbers that he can apply weird math too, If AEW on Max were doing so well not nly would Max announce the numbers it would be ordering more content and pushing the content more. It would be the face of their live sports offerings which literally doesnt have much. Go look what acts as the face of their live sports content. It's F1 racing and cycling. Not Kenny Omega.

>>18553713
Not just that, but ratings from non-transparent companies with flawed methodologies, ratings have never been precise

>>18553729
>play by my rules!
NAH. 3 MILLY, TRANNY. TOP 10 ON NETFLIX EVERY WEEK, TROONY.

>>18553728
WWE is scared of AEW so they use TNA as a shield KWAB

why does dave know how many views RAW gets but is more ambiguous for Dynamite?

>>18553748
WBD and Netflix have completely different communication styles, HBO is quality over quantity, Netflix is quick slop

>>18553745
This is the second thread and there's going to be many more this weekend because drones lose their shit over this stuff. To be fair, they (you) lose their shit over any perceived negative news regarding WWE, but ratings for whatever reason is a particular obsession for the autistic retards that treat defending WWE online like a job. Note - I'd say second job but there's zero chance anyone who cares about ratings wars is employed.

>>18553748
>all that off topic
The whole point of this thread is I think it’s believable that dynamite on streaming does 1/9 for raw viewers and drones are absolutely convinced that dynamite is doing 1/36 to raw viewers for literally no valid reason at all. Lucky for me it’s fun to tie them in knots with their reasoning because they have the slow mind that you need to watch upwards of 7+ hours of WWE a week.

>>18553763
>WWE is scared
>any time the WWE does anything slightly competitive towards AEW AEW trannies melt down because they can't handle competition of any kind
kek

>>18553760
so no MillE live, ok, got it

>>18553776
>This is the second thread and there's going to be many more this weekend because drones lose their shit over this stuff.
Just to be clear you are aware the OP is about an article that doesn't exist correct? AEW trannies are spamming news that is fake because they are afraid of WWE so much. You are aware of this correct?

>>18553770
Netflix runs their mouth WBD doesn't

>>18553780
it is also notable that AEW being a relatively new company is already doing so well, none of the boomers watching WWE for Cena and Taker have ever heard of AEW, in a few years I can see them both at a similar level of pop culture prominence

>>18553791
So the article is fake, and yet you've still replied how many times? Fifty? One hundred? Arguing over a supposedly fake article, that's how easy you are to work, and you admit this?

Thank you for proving my point.

>>18553780
>it’s believable that dynamite on streaming does 1/9 for raw viewers
Based on what? You thinking something and it being based on something beyond what you would like to believe are too different things. That's the difference between what you think is personally plausible and what is actually plausible given the information.

>>18553780
>I think it’s believable that dynamite on streaming does 1/9 for raw viewers
Unless you have actual hard data it doesn't. "My feelings want it to be true" doesn't make it true,
>drones lose their shit over this stuff
You guys are posting in a thread about a fake news article. You can't "no u dronies are the crazy ones here"

>>18553824
>Arguing over a supposedly fake article
If its supposed prove its real tranny? I'll wait.

>>18553763
WWE is beating AEW in live ratings over three different shows consistently weekly, AEW is in the same place ROH was a decade ago.

>>18553830
Already explained that dynamite was doing a generous 1/3 to raw on TV so 1/9 on streaming is believable. Again you have no actual thought or logic apart from ‘don’t hurt WWE, they are my fwennd’

>>18553824
>Arguing over a supposedly fake article, that's how easy you are to work,
I don't think you have a point. If someone posts something fake and other people respond that it's fake, and the first person, or others say it isn't, then what you have is not trolling so much as a small group of people that seem so worried about actual reality they are making stuff up.

WTF happened here? it reeks of bacon, is the fed having a bad day?

>>18553854
How many times did WWE counter program ROH again?

>>18553859
>is believable
I can do this too. It's believable that Dynamite gets under 50k on MAX because it's believable. You disagree? I don't care because it's believable.

>>18553854
interesting what channel was ROH on?

>>18552547 (OP)
>WON

>>18553865
Angry trannies made up a fake WON article it's just another day on this board.

>>18553882
Ok go. What are you basing that on. I’m basing it on dynamite did 1/3 on tv for raw so 1/9 is a perfectly believable streaming number. Buzz me up your reasoning dronie

>>18553862
>other people respond that it's fake
We are on a second thread for something that was posted just a few hours ago, because e-drones have zero lives, are very easy to work into a seething shoot, and have let ratings dominate an unhealthy amount of their lives.

>>18553882
this pig is REALLY dense

>>18553900
I am basing it on that it's believable that Dynamite would get under 50k compared to RAW so I am right because it's believable.

>>18553908
You are posting in an thread about a fake article trannies created in their heads.

>>18553897
KEK Fake News make fedophiles boil, what a bunch of thin skinned (not good for pork rinds) piggiEs

>>18553921
So you’re basing it on nothing? Nice. What a valid post. Buzzzzzzz

NEW THREAD

>>18553932
>>18553932

NEW THREAD

>>18553859
>Already explained that dynamite was doing a generous 1/3 to raw on TV
Well then your inference is not based on anything that actually makes sense. The two numbers have nothing to do with each other. The logic is super simple. One is a private owned platform the content producer has full control over. The other is needing to have your content purchased to put on a networks platform. One reaches a broader audience since it only requires a subscription and internet. The other requires a subscription to a particular cable provider zoned to your area and special equipment. The numbers don't provide inference to one another. Much in the way that a movie can do shit at the box office and be better on streaming. Or a song can find a fanbase through Spotify that was never given the chance to play over national radio.

>>18553928
>Fake News
glad you trannies admitted you have to lie and force fake news because you are scared of the WWE LMAO

>>18553940
No I just explained how it's believable.

>>18553945
If dynamite is getting 1/3 on tv of raw it is perfectly believable that 1/9 of the people who want to watch on Raw on Netflix are watching Dynamite on max. Like this is not a crazy number at all and it’s slashed from what they were doing on TV. How the fuck are people so crazy about this?

>>18553902
>We
>have zero lives,
This is sort of funny. You've spent all day claiming something that is wrong trying to protect some company you life, because you're worried about...something I have no idea. That it isn't that popular? That not as many people like it compared to another company? You this all the time because you don't have much of a life. Other people come here to stress relieve and see what the latest cope and meltdown is you're having. If you want to believe you're some master puppeteer for making people laugh and call you a faggot that's your prerogative though.

>>18553971
But it's also believable that AEW would be getting under 50k based on the WWE's ratings because it's believable that it would be that low.

>>18553486
Any proof or evidence to the contrary? Dave's senile ramblinslgs are not proof.

>>18553971
>If dynamite is getting 1/3 on tv of raw it is perfectly believable that 1/9 of the people
Because again you're not relating it to any actual info or data, you're just saying what you think would make sense. But if that were the case HBO would be pushing for more content not cancelling AEW content. They'd be ordering more complementary content like they were in the beginning. They aren't though.They'd be pushing AEW as a way to get subscriptions. They aren't. If you open Netflix WWE content is prominently featured. If you open Max, AEW content isn't easy to find. The numbers aren't there, because if they were they would be known and you wouldn't be guessing at them.

>>18553786
Nah that’s just your fake headcannon, delusional as a PigTranny is. Speaking of NO MILLY though, that’s what GAY EW does every week.

>>18554067
I used to enjoy console warring because it was stupid in nature. You just poke fun of each others wrestlers and that's it. AEW psychopaths have sucked any fun out of that with their insane delusions, spam and obsessions with being victims and deflecting everything back to the WWE.

>>18553865
PiggyCripple is samefagging a lot and needed a cope thread because he’s scared of TNA. Facts.

>most active thread is a shitflinging fest between company obsessed corpo niggerfaggots
Every day I wish this board would get fucking nuked.

>>18554241
No it's a thread where AEW trannies made up literal fake news because they are terrified of TNA and have been spamming this thread and the next one. This isn't a both sides are wrong thing

>>18554264
Kill yourself. I'm serious. KILL your fucking self NOW.

>>18554353
>die you should die right now I am the sane voice of reason here
dilate tranny

No millE?

>>18554456
KEK