Thread 18633345

BIG DAVE FROM THE TOP ROPE

he should star using a 100 star rating

>>18633345 (OP)
don't e-pigs ever grow tired of getting destroyed by dave

>>18633357
afraid not, my friend.

>>18633345 (OP)
Yeah. I remember when Siskel and Ebert started giving films three thumbs up. The silver screen classics couldn't compete with the workrate of the indies.

>>18633345 (OP)
He really is fucking mentally ill isn't he, kek

>>18633365
they didn't have any sort of genetic mutation that gave them three thumbs though ya dumbass. there's a near limitless amount of stars.

>>18633345 (OP)
>what if someone comes along who does ALL THE MOVES????

>>18633345 (OP)
>what if some guy combines all these guys and is better than all of them
Then you give him 5 stars?

>>18633366
AEW being a massive failure only enjoyed by smarks finally killed his mental state

why does Dave review wrestling matches if he hates them so much? his scale goes to infinity and the best rating he ever gave was 7 stars

>>18633345 (OP)
>it makes no sense
A rating system with no ceiling makes no sense. Dave absolutely destroyed whatever credibility he had as a "critic" when he broke his own scale. Rating a match 7 out of infinity is literally nonsensical.

>>18633383
this, the idea that some 10s are betteer than others is tacitly understood by all reviewers, mediums and consumers
dave is a rare exception of having to visualize it because he's shoot retarded and so are most wrestling fans (not my /pw/ brothers)

>>18633398
His scale thus far is out of thirteen, since he's rated matches -5 stars.

>>18633365
lol

>>18633345 (OP)
Makes sense. Take Madden football. It's scores used to be the 99 club. Now they're up to the 9999999999 club. Game reviews sites had to move passed 5's and 10's. Now they're handing out 500000k's

>>18633418
It also helps if you don't give every other match 5 stars

>>18633399
"At the time, this was literally the best match I thought I had ever seen."