>>81475487youre backpedaling so hard its painful. like yeah, obviously probability reflects missing info. you said "probability is the absence of cause" not "absence of measurement", not "incomplete data"
ABSENCE OF CAUSE. full stop
now youre rewriting your own claim four times deep and acting smug like we didnt all see it.
your words betrayed your understanding. no one misread you. you just dont know how to speak precisely because you dont actually get this shit and are a pseud
anyway, i'm going to work now. sorry for being a bulli, its how i vent excitement because i'm insane. if we were arguing irl, i'd passionately kiss you on the lips. BYEEEEEEE RETARD