>>81505112
>>compares being gay to women being attracted to more than the small monolith kind of men
That's not what I did, but your brain shut down, because you perceived it as being close to it, so you immediately pigeonholed it as such. Let me help you out. It wasn't a comparison. I used an example to demonstrate that you cannot choose what you are attracted to as a man. And you can use the example of a straight man trying to feel attracted to men, a man with very conventional taste trying to feel attracted to old deformed obese women, a man attracted to people trying to feel attracted to inanimate objects, etc. The object of the attraction doesn't matter. It's gender is tangential. What's important is that it's outside of your current attraction bounds. It's used to illustrate that attraction isn't something that you can choose. You may feel that you can, but it's because of an illusion brought about by the fact that men's attraction tends to be more broad. But it still has its bounds, and you can't change those bounds by will, because if you could, there would be nothing that would prevent you, a straight man, from feeling attracted to men. But you obviously can't, meaning that the premise is indeed false. Do you understand now?
