Who has the lowest standards on this board?
I'll start
>Has to be female (female)
>Preferably under age 50 (not required)

>male
>white
>skinny

>>81537201 (OP)
I would fuck a literal 2/10 if she was barren and was okay with being a secret slampig.

>>81537201 (OP)
is this for sex or a relationship?

>>81538404
I'm OP and mine were standards for a relationship.

>>81537201 (OP)
>Biofoid
>HTB+
>Virgin
>Skinny
>Somewhat relatable
>Has vaguely similar taste in aesthetics/media
I'm dying alone anyway. Might as well be picky

My hand with all 5 fingers

>>81537201 (OP)
>likes anime
>big tits
that's it

>>81538431
Oh, and be white and 19 - 25. In case my standards weren't high enough

>>81537201 (OP)
Ive fucked some uggos....

>>81538411
really? why? how bad are you?

>>81538483
I'm just not picky. My past girlfriends have been fairly attractive despite that.

>>81538498
why not? are you a virgin?

Is it a low standard if she NEEDS a red flag to qualify?

>>81538508
No, I've been with four women before. Not a lot but not nothing either.
I just don't consider myself special and don't have a problem with women being ugly, fat, or old.
It's weirder to me how most people do have all these picky standards for themselves.

>>81538519
what kind of red flag?

>>81537201 (OP)

>A lubricated, clean onahole.

I don't need to manufacture new humans and I have no emotional needs that require human validation.

>>81537201 (OP)
you arent as desperate as you're making urself out to be if i ever face revealed to you you would block me over for fembots