>>81570458>If we were talking about nothing, we'd both shut up.1.)You're not shut up, so you must not be talking about nothing.
2.) But if you're not talking about nothing, then you're talking about something, so you would actually be describing what happens when we talk about something, not nothing.
3.) If you're talking about something, then "1.)" can't be true. You're not gurenteed to not be talking about nothing, since your original claim "if we were talking about nothing..." would actually be saying "if we were talking about something..."
4.) If we'd shut up if we were talking about something, then that's evidence we could be talking about nothing, since we're not shut up.
5.) But if we're actually talking about nothing, then that takes us back to "1.)"
Basically, none of those sentences you wrote made any sense.
I see it like this: if you use the word "nothing" and mean it, then "nothing" must exist in idea space. Otherwise, you're not actually talking about "nothing," or at least not "nothing at all" for our case, and are misusing the word.