>>81616248There is no wisdom in the conventions of which you speak.
Question for you: why do you steep your language in your distaste for that which you despise? Are you so uninterested in understanding the people you insouciantly mock that you can't help but color your language in motivated reasoning and baseless assumptions? Your question is loaded with a paragraph of incoherent qualifiers, but it can't find room to clarify the "wisdom" that would be trumped. Your analogies are painfully dull, and your purple prose is marred with streaks of typos.