Only retards would struggle being put in this situation. All you have to do is ask both doors "What's 2 + 2" and then you'll find out which one is lying or telling the truth based on their answers.

inb4 they immediately begin talking philosophical semantics about how math is abstract and 2 doesnt mean anything

>>81631387
One of them will answer 4. If neither one gives a straight answer of 4 then they don't both tell the truth.

>>81631380 (OP)
The riddle doesn't demand that they're good at math. I was an evil wizard crafting this dilemma as a puzzle door for accessing my secret tower, I would make it so neither of them have common sense, so the truthful one is truthful but is really stupid and cannot reliably give factual answers on scientific problems.

>>81631380 (OP)
The whole point is you can only ask yes no questions though isnt it, or is that an assumption.

>>81631416
Is a flower a plant?

>>81631380 (OP)
The point is to figure out which door you need to go through in a single question, which may be the true door or the lying door. That's why you need to ask what the other door would say is the correct door to go through, because it's a single question to get the answer. If you asked 2+2 you would know which is the liar but not which door to go through, and you'd be out of questions. This particular drawing is not a correct statement of the riddle though since if it's the door itself saying both of those statements at least one must be false, and there is no correct formulation of those two statements that allows it.

>>81631387
>>81631403
>>81631406
>>81631416
>>81631434
How did not one of you understand this simple riddle for children? Jesus...

>>81631443
personally, i believe it is because i am retarded.

>>81631387
>math is abstract and 2 doesnt mean anything
That's completely incorrect and it misses the point of ZFC. 2 means applying a function twice.

>>81631416
>The whole point is you can only ask yes no questions though isnt it, or is that an assumption
Okay, does 2 + 2 equal 4? Answer yes or no, there I win now.

>>81631510
Not symbolically in every number base

>>81631521
>Not symbolically in every number base
What the fuck are you talking about nigger, quit pulling a Jordan Peterson and just answer the simple math question.

>>81631380 (OP)
youre somehow a bigger retard than all 3 characters and everyone on this board rn

>>81631539
What I'm talking about is that 2+2 can equal 1111, 100, 11, 10, or 4 depending on your number base. If you just say "2+2 equals 4" then that could be false if a different number base is used.

I thought you could only ask 1 question, no? And only one of the guards answer?

>>81631560
>What I'm talking about is that 2+2 can equal 1111, 100, 11, 10, or 4 depending on your number base. If you just say "2+2 equals 4" then that could be false if a different number base is used.
I should ask the doors if you are a gay nigger faggot, the one that says you aren't is the liar.

>>81631380 (OP)
can i not just ask them if they are a door?

>>81631565
I got it, ask them if their door connects to a hallway leading directly to the moon, the liar will say his door does in fact lead to the moon

>>81631569
I ask the door what you'd say 2+2 is. The answer is the opposite of what the door says.

>>81631569
hes actually right yk you gotta specify its a base 10 number system

>>81631380 (OP)
You've asked your one question and now know which is lying but you still don't know which door to take.

>>81631590
I cast force bolt on both doors ._.

>>81631596
The doors shatter on the ground. A klaxon sounds. You are now a murderer. The guards begin to pursue you.

I cut the Gordian knot in half with my sword

>>81631577
>what's 2 + 2
>"What do you mean 'what's 2 + 2?' Are we talking about base 10? Are you a tranny that should kill yourself? You can't just ask extremely ambiguous open ended and philosophical questions like 'what's 2 + 2', bucko.

>>81631613
>You can't just ask extremely ambiguous open ended and philosophical questions
Why?

>>81631573
How do you know that's not true?
There's magic talking doors, that might as well be real

>im a fuggin door, idc wtf a "math" is. futas with huge cocks will ravage u the moment u fall asleep.
>ur boypussy will be ravaged by futas with huge cocks the moment u fall asleep

now wut OP?
u feel good about trying to bully doors?
r u feeling full-FILLED with GIRL CUM?

>>81631621
But like one would lead to death and one would lead to freedom, and if I was walking to the moon without a space suit I would be dead

>>81631632
Wait no, I get it now im actually retarded I need to think more about this

I use an intimidation check
>*boom boom boom*
I rap against the doors with the pommel of my sword.
>this is the police! we have a warrant!
No doubt evil wizard is shitting bricks at this point and destroying his star trek folders.
I now use a perception check to discern the location of bricks being shat.

>>81631640
>wizard drops a steaming pile of shit from his machicolation right on top of your head

>>81631416
Does 2+2=4?

>>81631380 (OP)
>the other lies
Does this mean the other ALWAYS lies, or that he just lies occasionally? Because if it's the latter you're still fucked.

>>81631380 (OP)
How do you know if they're lying about always lying and always telling the truth?

>>81631674
Good point, one door said one door tells the truth, and the other door says that the other door lies. That could mean that both of them are liars.

>>81631674
its a theoretical situation and those are the rules that have been set. that is how riddles work.

This castle sucks ass, bullshit impossible riddle. I'm leaving to go adventure in the one next door.

>>81631708
No, come back. There's cake.

>>81631708
>you leave for the next castle, over the grassy hills you hear screaming, when you approach you see the main gates, right behind a trolley system with several people tied to the tracks

>>81631724
Fuck that. I think I see a cave with a sweet light show.

>>81631724
My word, this is terrible! The heroic thing would be to attempt rescuing the people, assuming they are innocent. These castles are almost always run by an evil wizard so I am assuming those tied to the tracks are innocent.

>>81631380 (OP)
Left one is the one telling the truth. Right one is a liar.

the one on the left proposed that one of them tells the truth and the one on the right said one of them lies. doesnt that just means left is the true door and right is the liar? if what left is saying is true then right is lying by saying it lies?

>>81631380 (OP)
isn't the framing of this question you get to only ask one/a certain set of questions and the answer yo need is how to escape?

This is a weird take on the classic two-door riddle.
It's suppose to involve two cerbuim guarding two doors, one truth-teller and one liar, with one door leading to salivation and the other to damnation. You only get to ask one question. The guards are not assigned to a specif door, the always lying guard could be in front of the salvation door.

>>81632046
It's a famous scene from picrel. The sphynxes shoot lasers from their eyes.

>>81631380 (OP)
This has been the best bot/ELS testing thread I have seen in years

>>81631577
You also need to define the '+' operator, what truth means, what a number is, what a question is and what it means to ask a question. If you can't do that you might as well just not bother asking.

>>81632077
>one door leading to salivation
baby I'm already salivating at the sight of you
forget the doors, let's go have some fun

>>81631416
Does 2 plus 2 equal 4 yes or no?

Got some post for God 'ere...

>>81631435
>ask if 2+2=4 to door x
>if she says that the statement is correct, ask the other door (liar) which door is the right one and do the opposite
>if she says that the statement is wrong, do the opposite of what is described above

>>81632779
You can ask both of the doors, collectively, a single question. You have to ask a question which simultaneously proves one of the doors to be a liar/truthful while also figuring out which one to go through.

>>81632795
Okay, I'll just do it the barbarian way and torture both until they tell me the right path (and take one of them with me in case they lied). I may be a brainlet but I'm not a fag. What about it, mr wizard of the tower?

>>81631380 (OP)
I'm retarded, but isn't this the irresistible force paradox?

>>81631510
The version of the riddle I've always heard is that you can only ask one question. The goal is to figure out which is the correct way to go. If you waste your one question on math, you may know which door is truthful and which is lying, but you still don't know the correct path.

>>81632853
Ohhhh my fucking Goooood JUST ASK THE DOOR WHAT THE OTHER DOOR WOULD SAY IF ASKED WHICH DOOR IS SAFE!!!
>hey, if I asked the door next to which door was safe to go in, what would it say?
If you asked the lying door then it'll say the opposite of what the truthful door would say, and would thus point you towards the bad door. Likewise if you asked the truthtelling door, it would say that the lying door would pick the bad door. Either way you know to not go into the door they tell you to go in, IT'S NOT THAT FUCKING HARD.

>>81633063
Yeah, this is the solution I remember from childhood. You just ask either door what the other one would say, and then you do the opposite. Their answers will be the same, because the liar door will lie about what the truthful one will say, and the truthful door will truthfully tell you the liar door's lie.

>>81631380 (OP)
I thought you could only ask them one question?